Animating the model makes these effects seem obvious.
As Professor Orzel tells Emmy: "Einstein succeeded where others had failed by showing that a careful treatment of time and motion make these effects inevitable".
Thus, David Cline, one of the weak neutral-current experimenters remarked, "At present I don't see how to make these effects [the weak neutral current event candidates] go away" (Galison, 1987, p. 235).
Such interactions should be evident as 'main effects' of the participating genotypes, but the magnitude of the apparent effect would be blunted without accounting for the etiologic cofactor, making these effects difficult to detect.
To make these effects easier to evaluate, we have separated the composite Kaplan-Meier survival curve (Fig. 2g) into several plots comparing these effects in a step-wise manner.
Robust expression of Hmo1, Ixr1, and Nhp10 protein was detected after a one-hour galactose induction, thus making these effects unlikely to be due to significant differences in expression of these HMGs from the GAL1 promoter.
It is noted that no reduction of the moment of inertia due to shear lag effects should be made as these effects are included in the consistent formulas for the shear coefficient.
When corrections are made for these effects the theory gives a reasonable estimate of the broad band frequency average (500 Hz bandwidths are usually required) modal density of typical spacecraft components such as platforms and side panels.
This is an unexplored field, for which the development of new ways to observe and measure BAEs is needed in order to make these potential effects accessible in such a way that they can be discussed by clinicians and users.
On the contrary, larger samples make these random effects irrelevant as positive and negative non-representative events tend to equally happen compensating this potential source of bias.
