Exact(1)
KU, NS, RDR, and VJ participated in the design of the study and made essential revisions to the manuscript.
Similar(58)
Make essential changes.
This does not make essential oil.
Before publication, the authors need to make the following essential revisions: 1) The authors refer to the study of Georgescu et al. (EMBO, 2009) and suggest that the observed clamp-OB CTD interaction provides "an alternative explanation" for the reduced DNA synthesis seen by them.
Make "Essentials" one category.
Essential revisions: We were overall satisfied with the changes made in this paper since the last version that was reviewed.
[Editors' note: what now follows is the decision letter after the authors submitted for further consideration.] Essential revisions: We were overall satisfied with the changes made in this paper since the last version that was reviewed.
The paper makes an important contribution and should be published after certain revisions: Essential revisions: 1) Circuit diagrams: There's a logical problem in the circuit diagrams shown.
Essential revisions: 1) Using CskAS expressing OT1 T cells, the authors made the puzzling finding that the phosphorylation of the inhibitory tail pY505, the direct target of Csk, did not change in response to 3-IB-PP1 treatment.
Essential revisions are below.
Essential revisions: 1) The dose response analysis needs revision.
Write better and faster with AI suggestions while staying true to your unique style.
Since I tried Ludwig back in 2017, I have been constantly using it in both editing and translation. Ever since, I suggest it to my translators at ProSciEditing.

Justyna Jupowicz-Kozak
CEO of Professional Science Editing for Scientists @ prosciediting.com