Suggestions(5)
Exact(3)
To illustrate this crucial point we consider, first of all, the embarrassing situation of a macroscopic object in the superposition of two differently located position states.
The density of the wave function of molecules of the macroscopic object in 3-space is the bridge between the wave function of the object and our experience of that object.
The macroscopic object in question was an aluminum plate about 20 micrometers in diameter, or a bit less than half the width of a human hair.
Similar(57)
The fact that interference is typically very well suppressed between localised states of macroscopic objects suggests that it is relevant to why macroscopic objects in fact appear to us to be in localised states.
Macroscopic objects in the world that we experience are really clusters of these atoms; changes in the objects we see qualitative changes or growth, say are caused by rearrangements or additions to the atoms composing them.
The well-known theory of convection, which well describes the heat exchange from hot macroscopic objects in air, underestimates the real cooling rate in the micron and sub-micron dimensional range.
Worlds are different when at least one macroscopic object is in macroscopically distinguishable states.
If the brain (a macroscopic object) is also in a chaotic dynamical state, making it sensitive to small disturbances, this additional neural firing, small as it is, would then be further amplified to the point where the brain states would evolve differently than if the neuron had not fired.
Because all macroscopic objects are in fact combinations of atoms, everything in the macroscopic world is subject to change, as their constituent atoms shift or move away.
The quantum measurement device must be a macroscopic object with macroscopically different states corresponding to different outcomes.
If you multiply that by the number of molecules in a macroscopic object, the amount of data [that needs to be teleported] is staggering".
Write better and faster with AI suggestions while staying true to your unique style.
Since I tried Ludwig back in 2017, I have been constantly using it in both editing and translation. Ever since, I suggest it to my translators at ProSciEditing.

Justyna Jupowicz-Kozak
CEO of Professional Science Editing for Scientists @ prosciediting.com