A variety of formal and semiformal validation techniques applicable to systems expressible as finite state machine models are discussed.
Based on the equations above, the linearized induction machine model is illustrated in Fig. 5.
Turing here is discussing the possibility that, when seen as as a quantum-mechanical machine rather than a classical machine, the Turing machine model is inadequate.
The state machine model is non-parametric and needs no sophisticated algorithm for identification.
Based on this, a corresponding induction machine model is proposed and used to reveal the internal mechanism.
The expressive power of the register machine (equivalently the Turing machine) model is retained, while neither of the above attacks work anymore.
If single machine model is to be called, the API aggregate_dt needs to be called to reduce turbine-governors of different types to a single model.
A corresponding induction machine model is proposed, based on which the interaction mechanism between IM loads and TVC in a STATCOM can be intuitively understood.
Simple electricity-gas conversion factors are applied to all studies and the compressor machine modeling is also reduced to a compression factor.
Under this architecture, a cloud machine model is built considering both the static and dynamic manufacturing information, and then published into the CMfg platform.
For the design and analysis of algorithms that process huge data sets, a machine model is needed that handles parallel disks.
