Exact(4)
Mingling (M) is significant or highly significant in three subcanopy specialists with relatively low growth rates (Gonioma kamassi, Curtisia dentata, Elaeodendron croceum).
If link (i to m ) is significant, it means that individual m is relatively important to individual i in i's friends.
Following the statistical validation [41], a directed tie (i rightarrow m) is significant at the level of α if alpha_{i,m} = 1- k_{i}-1) int_{0}^{w_{i,m}}(1- k_{i}-1}-2},{mathrm {d}}x < alpha, (1- k_{i}-1k_{int_{s the degree of individual i.
For those reactions whose regime is linear (L), only the ratio V max / K m is significant.
Similar(56)
Increasing slope significantly raised the probability and level of damage by at least 30% in five of the seven sites, whereas proximity to river and wetlands (< 100 m) was significant in only two of the sites and at lower levels.
Roadway proximity ≤ 100 m was significant for PP, whereas proximity ≤ 200 m was significant for CRP.
The maximum decrease in +dLVP/dt of -38 ± 5% at 1 × 10-4 M and -19 ± 5% at 1 × 10-4 M was significant for propofol and methohexitone, respectively.
For example, while industrial land use within 1600 m was significant in both (m+p) xylenes and o-xylene models, the effect of industry (34%and53%3%, respectively) differed in the two models (Table 5).
We observed a significant increase in Bad expression for 5 and 10 μ M treatment with ATRA and the RAMBAs compared with control (P<0.05), with the exception of 4-HPR, where all treatment concentrations of 4-HPR (0.1, 1 and 5 μ M) were significant (P<0.05) and VN/69-1, where treatments with 1, 5, and 10 μ M VN/69-1 were significant (P<0.05).
Adjusted association of aspirin use with fewer metastases (M) was significant for colorectal and lung cancers (OR ∼0.8, 95% CI 0.7 0.9) and for breast cancer (OR ∼0.6, 95% CI 0.5 0.9) but not for prostate cancer (OR ∼0.9, 95% CI 0.8 1.0).
The interaction of parental history with residential proximity within 75 m was significant for prevalent asthma (1 degree of freedom, Wald chi-square 4.39; p = 0.04) and for current wheeze (p = 0.01), but not for lifetime asthma.
Write better and faster with AI suggestions while staying true to your unique style.
Since I tried Ludwig back in 2017, I have been constantly using it in both editing and translation. Ever since, I suggest it to my translators at ProSciEditing.

Justyna Jupowicz-Kozak
CEO of Professional Science Editing for Scientists @ prosciediting.com