Your English writing platform
Discover LudwigSuggestions(5)
Exact(1)
Synopsis #include "flcs.h" ALIGNMENTS flcs (char *X, char *Y, FRAGSET M ); Arguments: X : points to a string; Y : points to a string; M : point to a FRAGSET_STRUCT, that represents a set of fragments.
Similar(59)
My goal is to keep Dot Earth "the right room for an argument" — in the purest sense of the word as used in the amazing Monty Python sketch involving Michael Palin (Man) and John Cleese (Arguer): M: An argument isn't just contradiction.
The compactness of (mathcal{R}_{1-gamma }(t)), (t>0) and m, an argument similar to the one used in Theorem 3.1 yields the precompactness of ({y_{n}}_{n=1}^{infty }).
Later, in [13, 14], Oryan considered a class of power series with algebraic coefficients and proved that under certain conditions these series take values in the subclass U m for algebraic arguments and in the set of Liouville numbers for Liouville number arguments, respectively.
where Θ denotes the convolution for the LCT and ∗ denotes the conventional convolution for the FT. The WD of X M computed with arguments (u,v) is equal to the WD of x computed with arguments (t,ω): overline X (t,omega) = 2{e^{2iuv}}int_{- infty }^{+ infty} {{X_{M}} varepsilon X_{M}^(2u - varepsilon){e^{- 2ivvarepsilon}}dvarepsilon}.
In [12], Oryan considered a class of power series with algebraic coefficients and proved that under certain conditions these series take values in the subclass U m for algebraic arguments.
Mr Obama says Ms Warren's arguments "don't stand the test of fact and scrutiny .If anything, TPA faces a rougher ride in the House of Representatives.
This top-shelf 1 Series M leaves that argument for dead: enthusiasts can easily ascertain, and appreciate, the difference between this $50,000 car and a $65,000 M3, especially when these BMWs will run nose-to-tail in virtually any situation.
It's no fun, but it's not unheard of, and it won't impact credit scores.In a nutshell, Ms Smith's arguments assume that an underwater homeowner immediately becomes indistinguishable from a homeowner in default.
For the case x ⋅ ( g ( x ) − q ¯ ) < 0, when | x | > M, a similar argument can complete the proof.
For the moment, let us simply say that (P.6) is, on the face of it, not a principle that can be added to M without further argument.
More suggestions(2)
Write better and faster with AI suggestions while staying true to your unique style.
Since I tried Ludwig back in 2017, I have been constantly using it in both editing and translation. Ever since, I suggest it to my translators at ProSciEditing.

Justyna Jupowicz-Kozak
CEO of Professional Science Editing for Scientists @ prosciediting.com