lush with

USAGE SUMMARY

"lush with" is correct and usable in written English.
You would typically use it when describing something that is abundant in a certain quality, such as "The landscape was lush with vibrant colors."

✓ Grammatically correct

News & Media

Lifestyle

Travel

Human-verified examples from authoritative sources

Exact Expressions

57 human-written examples

The show's lush with them.

The New Yorker

The fields are suddenly lush with woodland.

Independent

As in the movie, Rawle's Oz is lush with color.

The New Yorker

The land was lush, with green trees and bright flowers.

The New York Times - Travel

It is striking — dense and complex and lush with possibility.

The New York Times - Sports

It's lush with salty ham or, as here, smoky fish.

The Guardian - Lifestyle

Every panel is lush with visual and psychological detail.

The New York Times - Books

The book is lush with high-end pastoral prose.

The Guardian - Books

His lawn is green, free of pesticides, lush with weeds.

The New York Times

The nightmares were fabulous: lush with fantastic fears, hilarious with misadventure.

The New Yorker

As you spy a cherry tree lush with blossoms, a you-know-what will zip by.

The New York Times

Expert writing Tips

Best practice

Use "lush with" to vividly describe landscapes, gardens, or any environment that is thriving and abundant with specific features. It adds depth and richness to your descriptions.

Common error

Avoid using "lush with" in contexts where it feels forced or overly flowery. In technical or factual writing, opt for more direct and objective language.

Linguistic Context

The phrase "lush with" functions primarily as a descriptive adjective phrase. It modifies a noun, indicating that the noun is characterized by a rich and abundant presence of something. Ludwig AI confirms its correct usage in descriptive contexts.

Expression frequency: Very common

Frequent in

News & Media

40%

Lifestyle

30%

Travel

20%

Less common in

Formal & Business

5%

Science

3%

Reference

2%

Ludwig's WRAP-UP

In summary, the phrase "lush with" is a grammatically sound and commonly used adjective phrase that paints a picture of rich abundance. Ludwig AI confirms its proper usage. Predominantly found in News & Media, Lifestyle, and Travel contexts, it effectively conveys vivid imagery and sensory experiences. To enhance your writing, use "lush with" to add depth to your descriptions, but avoid overuse in overly sentimental or technical contexts. Alternative phrases like "abundant in" or "rich in" may be more suitable depending on the specific nuance you want to convey.

More alternative expressions

Phrases that express similar concepts, ordered by semantic similarity:

rich in

Emphasizes the high concentration or quality of a particular element within something.

abundant in

This phrase focuses on the plentiful quantity of something, highlighting the sheer amount that is present.

exuberant with

Conveys a sense of joyful and vigorous abundance.

teeming with

Suggests a lively abundance, often used for living things or dynamic elements.

laden with

Indicates being heavily burdened or filled, often with positive connotations like fruit on a tree.

overflowing with

Implies an excessive abundance, almost beyond capacity.

filled with

A more general term for being full of something, lacking the richness implied by "lush".

profuse with

Highlights the generous and unrestrained quality of the abundance.

replete with

Suggests a complete or full state, often used for formal contexts.

well-endowed with

Highlights the superior level of endowment with a certain characteristic.

FAQs

How can I use "lush with" in a sentence?

You can use "lush with" to describe something abundant in a particular quality or feature. For example, "The garden was lush with roses" or "The music was lush with harmonies".

What are some alternatives to "lush with"?

Alternatives include "abundant in", "rich in", "teeming with", or "overflowing with", depending on the specific nuance you want to convey.

Is "lush with" formal or informal?

"Lush with" can be used in both formal and informal contexts, although it's more common in descriptive or literary writing, which tends to be slightly less formal.

What's the difference between "lush with" and "filled with"?

"Lush with" implies a rich, thriving abundance, often associated with natural beauty or sensory experience. "Filled with" is a more general term for being full of something, without necessarily conveying the same sense of richness.