Exact(10)
Various material characteristics have been proposed as being important to optimise the laser sintering process, key aspects of which have been combined in this work to develop an understanding of the most crucial requirements for LS process design and materials selection.
Therefore, we do not need to deal with the LS process before updating the residuals.
In this work the influence of the sample size on the porosity measurement is discussed, as well as its representativeness of the LS process itself.
However, it is not yet clear how the LS process affects the porosity and geometrical characteristics of the cell structural elements.
The knowledge about the porosity value and its distribution within the part allows to perform a quality control of the LS process, and gives insights in how to improve it.
Getting this information allows to perform quality control of the LS process, gives insights into how to improve it, and might help to take into account manufacturing process variability during the design phase.
Similar(50)
A continuous counter-current L-L process was also developed.
at ambient temperature, the conversion for a batch liquid liquid (L-L) process was found to be as good as for the S-L process with a shorter reaction duration.
This work focuses on the 3D full-loop CFD isothermal simulation of a transparent plexi-glass small-scale CFB carbonator built by IFK for the hydrodynamic investigation of the CFB reactor, utilized for the investigation of the calcium looping (Ca-L) process.
From this, we might expect the one-step assembly (features to word) of the holistic (W) process to be faster than the two-step assembly (features to letters to word) of the by-parts (L) process.
Similarly, Mr. Chips [48] and the Dual Route Cascaded model [49] simulate a wide variety of visual and language effects on reading rate and latency, but both models implement only the L process, plan to later add S, and omit W entirely.
Write better and faster with AI suggestions while staying true to your unique style.
Since I tried Ludwig back in 2017, I have been constantly using it in both editing and translation. Ever since, I suggest it to my translators at ProSciEditing.

Justyna Jupowicz-Kozak
CEO of Professional Science Editing for Scientists @ prosciediting.com