Your English writing platform
Discover LudwigSuggestions(1)
Similar(60)
An ESR of <30 mm/h (first hour) and CRP <6 mg/l were considered the cut off values for going to the second stage.
Maintenance therapy should be adapted to serum trough levels with a 2 mg/l cut off for each agent based on the laboratory reference.
From 1993, this was combined with prostate specific antigen testing, with 4 µg/L as cut off.
For the sake of this analysis all data was dichotomised into 'high' and 'normal' as close to the 6.1 mmol/L cut off as possible by combining groups above and below this level.
However, Lamb and co-workers evaluated 60 patients with localized clear cell RCC, only, and used a CRP level of >10 mg/l as cut off point.
Our study data suggest that LBP (cut off level 20 μg/ml), CRP (cut off level 30 mg/l) and IL-6 (cut off level 16.3 pg/ml) are comparable in terms of their diagnostic abilities in diagnosing infection.
146 A CT L/S cut-off of value of 0.8 yielded 100% specificity and 82% sensitivity for diagnosing macrovesicular steatosis of 30% or greater, 147 although a CT L/S cut off of 1.0 for defining steatosis has been used in some studies.
Our study data suggest that CRP (cut off level 100 mg/l) and IL-6 (cut off level 50 pg/ml) have the best qualities in identifying the noninfected patients.
The average of the urea level at baseline (4.2 mmol/L) were used as cut off and the data split to those with lower levels of 4.2 mmol/L and those with higher levels of 4.2 mmol/L.
Realistic finite fractal roughness consists of the following four morphological characteristics: fractal dimension (DH); the strength of fractality, which is the magnitude of the power spectrum at the unit roughness wavenumber; and the lower and upper (L) cut-off lengths, which are related to cut-off wavenumbers in the power spectrum.
Our data indicate that the majority of the women were Fe deficient, about one-fifth were retinol deficient (using the 1·047 μmol/l cut off) and two-fifths were vitamin C deficient.
Write better and faster with AI suggestions while staying true to your unique style.
Since I tried Ludwig back in 2017, I have been constantly using it in both editing and translation. Ever since, I suggest it to my translators at ProSciEditing.

Justyna Jupowicz-Kozak
CEO of Professional Science Editing for Scientists @ prosciediting.com