Your English writing platform
Discover LudwigSuggestions(1)
Exact(6)
The regression equation with the highest accuracy was indicated by the lowest standard error of estimate (SEE).
The results indicated that the models based on the fruit width, third projected area and assumed oblate spheroid volume have the highest determination coefficient (R2) and the lowest standard error of estimate (SEE).
Among ANNs the 24-12-1 stRucture with R value of 0.817, among DTs the MSP tree with R value of 0.906 and among SVMs the RBF form with R value of 0.920 had the highest value of correlation coefficient and the lowest standard error of 0.452.
We then chose the model with the lowest standard error of residuals (the Huber method exhibited the lowest standard error for the model residuals for all indicators except adjusted hospital readmissions, see Additional File 2 Annex 2).
The lowest standard error of the regression coefficient was observed for protein yield, followed by mastitis and fertility.
Despite not making use of pre-intervention information, this model achieves the lowest standard error of the log odds ratio of all the models considered.
Similar(54)
Results showed the HPLN-ML models had the best goodness-of-fit and efficiency, and models with ML priors yielded estimates with the lowest standard errors.
The HF/6-31G d,p) and HF/6-31++G d,p) results yield the lowest standard errors (0.0015 and 0.0014 Å, respectively) and correspond to the calculated points in closest proximity to the experimental one.
Across traits and PE high h of almost 1 with the lowest standard errors were found consistently for the Angus breed only.
The highest correlations and the lowest standard errors of these correlations were obtained for udder floor position (0.76) and rear udder attachment (0.73).
The empirical standard errors of methods are given in Figure 5. Complete data analysis has the lowest standard errors, while complete cases and parametric imputation also tend to be low.
Write better and faster with AI suggestions while staying true to your unique style.
Since I tried Ludwig back in 2017, I have been constantly using it in both editing and translation. Ever since, I suggest it to my translators at ProSciEditing.

Justyna Jupowicz-Kozak
CEO of Professional Science Editing for Scientists @ prosciediting.com