Your English writing platform
Discover LudwigSuggestions(5)
"lowest discrepancies" is correct and usable in written English.
You can use it to describe a situation in which there is minimal difference between two different values, such as: "The researcher found the lowest discrepancies in the data when comparing the two samples."
Exact(1)
Although model 2 had the lowest discrepancies for fasts up to 50 days, between 50 and 200 days it was more discrepant than model 3. On average, model 3 provided the least discrepant predictions over the widest duration of fasts.
Similar(59)
Bases that fail to reach this threshold are called 'N.' The optimum total threshold quality score is determined empirically to be 12, which yields the highest base-call rate with the lowest discrepancy between genotypes for replicate samples.
They explore the distribution of the impurity atoms by calculating the discrepancy factor (eq 41) around each unrelaxed impurity atom when placed on either the Li or Nb site and assume that the site with the lowest discrepancy factor is the likely site for the impurity as described in more detail in section 8.3.
U-designs generated from an orthogonal array with less weighted aberration are shown to have low discrepancies on average.
Quasi-Monte Carlo methods are known to converge faster (Caflisch 1998) and provide low discrepancies, which is attributed to the improved uniformity.
Results showed very low discrepancies between the real experiment measurements and the model output which ensures the applicability of this method.
The quasi-random Monte Carlo sampling implemented via the Hammersley method provides low discrepancies which are ascribed to an algorithm that enhances uniformity and spread over the design space.
This characteristic is known as low-discrepancy sequence sampling.
These are also known as low-discrepancy sequences.
The systematic review found rather low discrepancy rates.
This inequality states that sequences with low discrepancy lead to low error [9].
Write better and faster with AI suggestions while staying true to your unique style.
Since I tried Ludwig back in 2017, I have been constantly using it in both editing and translation. Ever since, I suggest it to my translators at ProSciEditing.

Justyna Jupowicz-Kozak
CEO of Professional Science Editing for Scientists @ prosciediting.com