Exact(4)
In addition the SVR of group III was lower than groups I or II (P < 0.05).
The mean GCS of patients in groups 1 was significantly lower than groups 2 9 (p=0.02 9
After 4 hours ventilation, W/D in group A (5.58 ± 1.05) were lower than groups B, C and D, significantly (6.56 ± 0.82, 6.58 ± 0.96, 6.94 ± 0.98, P < 0.05), but there was no difference between group A and the ARDS group.
When group F was included in the analyses (Table 5), there was a significant treatment (P = 0.0296) effect and in the post-hoc analyses the body weight in group F was significantly lower than groups A-E.
Similar(56)
Group II presented IL-6 and CRP concentrations significantly lower than group III.
Also the SVR of group III was significantly lower than group II (P < 0.05).
The incidence of hypotension in group M-P was lower than group (P = 0.01).
The SIt scores in group C were significantly lower than group B on days 28, 42, and 56, and goblet cell density in group C was significantly lower than group A on days 14, 28, 42, and 56.
Using an intention-to-treat analysis and a treatment-received analysis, respectively, the pharmaceutical cost of group M-P was lower than group P PP <0.01) and its ICU cost was lower than group M (P <0.01; P = 0.015).
The scores of nitrotyrosine positivity in groups 2, 3, and 4 were significantly lower than group 1 (P < 0.001).
Group C's experience score of Rhodes index was lower than group A's: 0.81 ± 2.56 versus 3.94 ± 5.25.
Write better and faster with AI suggestions while staying true to your unique style.
Since I tried Ludwig back in 2017, I have been constantly using it in both editing and translation. Ever since, I suggest it to my translators at ProSciEditing.

Justyna Jupowicz-Kozak
CEO of Professional Science Editing for Scientists @ prosciediting.com