Sentence examples for lower priority for from inspiring English sources
The phrase "lower priority for" is grammatically correct and can be used in written English.
It is typically used to describe something that is not as important or urgent as something else. Example: "I understand that the project is important, but we need to give our current clients a lower priority for now."
Some fear the new name could mean that children and families will now become a lower priority for ministers.
But infections have apparently begun to climb as the epidemic has become a lower priority for the government.
For years, family sedans have been a lower priority for General Motors and the other Detroit automakers.
But in a region devastated by AIDS, tuberculosis and malaria, blindness remains a lower priority for governments and individuals.
I have heard of cases where people with disabilities are given a lower priority for life-saving antiretrovirals.
It said: "Overall, 60 practices (less than 1%) previously in higher priority bands one and two will now move to bands which are of lower priority for inspection.
Our findings could reflect differences in configuration of health services compared with other countries and may indicate that specialisation towards surgery and treatment of more complex disorders in some large hospitals could lead to lower priorities for more common emergency disorders among older people.
As it turned out, the Tories hardly mentioned their inheritance tax pledge during the election campaign last year and have made it a lower priority than, for example, raising the threshold at which income tax starts being levied.
AACE/ACE lowered priorities for sulfonylureas (due to hypoglycemia, weight gain, fluid retention, limited durability of effectiveness) and for thiazolidinediones (weight gain, fluid retention, congestive heart failure, fractures, cardiac events).
Hence, the packet dropping is much higher for lower priority packets than for higher priority packets.
On the other hand, additional advocacy for PMTCT is required because HIV/AIDS is a lower priority health issue for governments in low-prevalence countries, and international donors have little interest in supporting programs compared to some high-prevalence settings.
