Sentence examples for lower paws from inspiring English sources
Finish the sketch with the lower paws.
STZ resulted in diabetic neuropathy with hyperglycemia and a lower paw withdrawal threshold (PWT), accompanied by elevations in the expression of the NADPH oxidase subunits p47phox and gp91phox and in the levels of hydrogen peroxide (H2O2) and malondialdehyde (MDA) and a reduction in superoxide dismutase (SOD) activity (P < 0.05) in the spinal cord.
Patients are switched back to conventional mechanical ventilation when they are able to tolerate a lower Paw (currently 20 24 cmH2O).
At baseline, female Sprague-Dawley rats showed a significantly lower paw withdrawal threshold to mechanical stimuli versus male rats (P < 0.01; Figure 3).
In the present study, female Sprague-Dawley rats had a significantly lower paw withdrawal threshold to mechanical stimuli than male rats, before and after surgery.
Noisy pressure support ventilation improved oxygenation and reduced venous admixture at a lower Paw, mean compared with PCV in a model of surfactant depletion [ 44].
The three groups of rats with nerve injuries manifested a lower paw withdrawal threshold (PWT) in the behavioral measurement of mechanical allodynia and a shorter painful-behavior duration in the cold allodynia test over 28 days.
In contrast, 18-week-old ank/ank mice had lower paw signals than did the younger mutant mice (8 versus 18 weeks; P = 0.01; 12 versus 18 weeks; P = 0.03).
MMT rats also had lower paw withdrawal thresholds in their operated limb relative to their contralateral limb (P = 0.017), with MCL sham animals tending to have differences between the operated and contralateral limb (P = 0.065; Figure 3).
Although surgically treated control animals developed significant cold allodynia against acetone stimulation, rats perineurally treated with DBV showed inhibition of cold allodynia development, producing significantly lower paw withdrawal frequency (PWF).
MMT rats tended to have lower paw withdrawal thresholds in their operated limb than did naïve controls (P = 0.056), but were not different from MCL-sham animals (P = 0.914).
