lower limit of

USAGE SUMMARY

The phrase "lower limit of" is correct and usable in written English.
It is typically used in contexts involving measurements, thresholds, or boundaries, indicating the minimum value or point of something. Example: "The lower limit of the acceptable temperature range for this experiment is 15 degrees Celsius."

✓ Grammatically correct

Science

Human-verified examples from authoritative sources

Exact Expressions

60 human-written examples

Values below the lower limit of quantitation (BLOQ) were inputted as half of lower limit of quantitation (LLOQ/2)53.

Nature

The lower limit of quantification (LLOQ) was 1.0 ng/ml.

Journal of Chromatography B

The lower limit of quantification was 0.25 ng·mL−1.

Chinese Journal of Natural Medicines

The validated lower limit of quantification was 1 ng/ml.

Journal of Pharmaceutical and Biomedical Analysis

The lower limit of detection (LLOD) was 3 ng/mL.

Journal of Chromatography A

The lower limit of quantitation was 20.0 pg/mL.

Journal of Pharmaceutical and Biomedical Analysis

lower limit of quantitation.

AAPS Open

lower limit of detection.

AMB Express

Lower limit of quantification.

Chemistry Central Journal

Lower limit of quantification for quality control.

Chemistry Central Journal

limit and the lower limit of.

EURASIP Journal on Advances in Signal Processing

Expert writing Tips

Best practice

When using "lower limit of" in scientific writing, ensure the units of measurement are clearly specified to avoid ambiguity. For example, state "lower limit of detection: 5 ng/mL" instead of just "lower limit of detection: 5".

Common error

Avoid using "lower limit of" when you actually mean the highest possible value. The "lower limit of" something is the minimum, not the maximum. Always double-check your intended meaning to prevent miscommunication.

Linguistic Context

The phrase "lower limit of" functions primarily as a modifier, specifically specifying the minimum boundary or threshold of a measurable or quantifiable entity. As Ludwig examples show, it is often paired with nouns such as "quantification", "detection", or "titration" to set a minimum measurable amount.

Expression frequency: Very common

Frequent in

Science

100%

Less common in

News & Media

0%

Formal & Business

0%

Academia

0%

Ludwig's WRAP-UP

The phrase "lower limit of" is a grammatically correct and frequently used expression, especially within scientific and technical contexts. Ludwig AI affirms its usability in written English. Its primary function is to specify the minimum boundary or threshold of a measurable entity, such as the "lower limit of detection" or "lower limit of quantification". While "lower limit of" is prevalent in formal settings, related phrases like "minimum threshold for" can be suitable in less formal contexts. When using this phrase, clarity and precision, especially regarding units of measurement, are key. Common errors involve confusing it with the "upper limit", underscoring the importance of verifying your intended meaning. Examples from Ludwig demonstrate consistent usage in scientific publications, further solidifying its role in defining quantifiable limits.

More alternative expressions

Phrases that express similar concepts, ordered by semantic similarity:

minimum threshold for

Focuses on the minimum level required for something to occur or be acceptable.

lowest bound of

Emphasizes the mathematical or statistical boundary.

minimum value of

Highlights the smallest possible quantity or amount.

floor value of

Similar to minimum value, but often used in programming or financial contexts.

bottom range of

Indicates the lowest part of a spectrum or scale.

inferior limit of

A more formal or technical way of saying "lower limit of".

base level of

Focuses on the foundational or starting point.

smallest extent of

Highlights the minimum degree or scope.

minimum degree of

Refers to the least acceptable amount.

absolute minimum of

Indicates the very lowest possible value, without exception.

FAQs

How is "lower limit of" typically used in scientific research?

In scientific research, "lower limit of" often refers to the minimum detectable or quantifiable value of a measurement. For example, it may describe the "lower limit of detection" (LOD) or the "lower limit of quantification" (LOQ) for an analytical method.

What's the difference between "lower limit of detection" and "lower limit of quantification"?

The "lower limit of detection" (LOD) is the lowest level at which a signal can be reliably distinguished from the background noise. The "lower limit of quantification" (LOQ) is the lowest concentration that can be reliably measured and quantified with acceptable accuracy and precision.

Are there specific contexts where using "minimum threshold" is better than "lower limit of"?

"Minimum threshold" might be preferred in more general or non-technical contexts where the idea of a boundary needs to be expressed simply. "Lower limit of" is common in scientific and technical fields, where precision is valued, such as defining analytical measures.

What can I say instead of "lower limit of normality" in medical contexts?

In medical contexts, alternatives to "lower limit of normality" include "lower reference limit", "lower end of the normal range", or simply "minimum normal value". All these options specify the boundary for what is considered medically typical.