Your English writing platform
Discover LudwigSuggestions(1)
Exact(7)
Thus, an exorbitantly large number of lower level function evaluations will typically be required to appropriately resolve a BLOP using the N-BLEA.
Nevertheless, the outcome achieved is very much similar to the previous case where M-BLEA is found to considerably outperform N-BLEA by saving more than 50%% of the lower level function evaluations required for convergence.
As can clearly be seen in Table 1, the performance of the M-BLEA isignificantlyly superior in comparison to N-BLEA with respect to the number of lower level function evaluations required for convergence.
Focusing on the averaged (mean) performance of either algorithm, we find that the M-BLEA saves at least 57.06 % of lower level function evaluations in comparison to N-BLEA.
Thus, the total number of lower level function evaluations can be expected to be at least halved as compared to N-BLEA, which is indeed found to be the case.
The performance of the optimizers has been quantified in terms of the total number of lower level function evaluations required for convergence (i.e., for the upper level termination criterion to be satisfied).
Similar(53)
Bottom-up testing is a method that starts with lower level functions – typically with the functional elements used in the system – for example PTOC.
These functions access lower level functions in Phya that are not normally accessed directly by the application developer.
The psychological level thereby becomes emergent, exhibiting new interactions and properties relatively independent of lower level functions (genetic and physiological) and able in part to influence them.
All functions that fall under either of these two classes have relationships ranging from the simplest to the most complex, so that functions of the second class presuppose, and are based on, lower level functions of the first class.
Weaker lower level functioning in VI individuals, may lead to higher level impairments like the secondary amblyopia effect [ 8, 9].
Write better and faster with AI suggestions while staying true to your unique style.
Since I tried Ludwig back in 2017, I have been constantly using it in both editing and translation. Ever since, I suggest it to my translators at ProSciEditing.

Justyna Jupowicz-Kozak
CEO of Professional Science Editing for Scientists @ prosciediting.com