Your English writing platform
Discover LudwigExact(2)
The average size (diameter, nm) of CCIONPs is 200.5 nm, which confirms that the prepared nanoparticles lie in the nanometer range, whereas, in the case of CNPs, it is shown that they are quite lower in size than CCIONPs.
However, copy number losses are lower in size than copy number gains (147.33 Kb versus 203.82 Kb; Mann-Whitney U test p < 0.01).
Similar(58)
Agreement was lower in medium size than in small size software.
A projection spatial size approach is assumed to have lower resolution in size than an intensity based for pore sizes at the order of the detector pixel size.
In the semi-urgent group, the odds of on-time surgery were 36% lower in list-size category 2, OR = 0.64 (0.5470.75), 47% lower in category 3, OR = 0.53 (0.45–0.62), and 51% lower in category 4, OR = 0.49 (0.41–0.60), compared to list-size category 1 (clearance time less than one week).
Among all patients, the crude odds of on-time surgery was 58% lower in list-size category 2, OR = 0.42 (0.37–0.48), 66% lower in category 3, OR = 0.34 (0.31–0.38), and 71% lower in category 4, OR = 0.29 (0.25–0.32), compared to list-size category 1 (data not shown).
† Associated with one additional surgery performed without wait-list registration In the non-urgent group, the crude odds of on-time surgery were 12% lower in list-size category 1, OR = 0.88 (0.61–1.25), 61% lower in category 3, OR = 0.39 (0.28–0.55), and 70% lower in category 4, OR = 0.30 (0.30–0.30).
The SV-C-Met,Arg/Lys,Lys variant rendered two products, the one with the lower mobility corresponds in size to wt C and represents 7% of protein C synthesized at 10 hpe.
MIN and PBC DV were generally much lower and similar in size to each other, but variability was more pronounced in the latter.
IPC as well as BPC caused a significant lowering in infarct size of hearts from non-diet controls (NDC) (p < 0.01 respectively), when compared to those of NPC hearts.
It was significantly lower in fish from size class 1 than in fish from the other size classes.
Write better and faster with AI suggestions while staying true to your unique style.
Since I tried Ludwig back in 2017, I have been constantly using it in both editing and translation. Ever since, I suggest it to my translators at ProSciEditing.

Justyna Jupowicz-Kozak
CEO of Professional Science Editing for Scientists @ prosciediting.com