Used and loved by millions
Since I tried Ludwig back in 2017, I have been constantly using it in both editing and translation. Ever since, I suggest it to my translators at ProSciEditing.
Justyna Jupowicz-Kozak
CEO of Professional Science Editing for Scientists @ prosciediting.com
lower efficient
Grammar usage guide and real-world examplesUSAGE SUMMARY
The phrase "lower efficient" is not correct in English.
Did you mean "less efficient"? You can use "less efficient" when comparing the efficiency of two or more things, indicating that one is not as efficient as the other. Example: "The new system is less efficient than the previous one, leading to longer processing times."
⚠ May contain grammatical issues
Science
News & Media
Alternative expressions(6)
Table of contents
Usage summary
Human-verified examples
Expert writing tips
Linguistic context
Ludwig's wrap-up
Alternative expressions
FAQs
Human-verified examples from authoritative sources
Exact Expressions
3 human-written examples
And people who reported high efficient sleep --better quality -- were five times less likely to develop the common cold than those who reported lower efficient sleep levels.
News & Media
We have analytically and numerically studied certain computable upper (reliable) and lower (efficient) bounds of the FEM BEM error ‖ | u − U ℓ ‖ | in the energy norm.
RV pacing displayed early septal wall thickening and opposing wall thinning with a lower efficient strain compared with RA (257 ± 124%/ms vs 129 ± 80%/ms, P < 0.05), whereas both CRTf and CRTa restored efficient strain to RA pacing levels (205 ± 78%/ms and 223 ± 76%/ms).
Science
Human-verified similar examples from authoritative sources
Similar Expressions
57 human-written examples
The lower, more efficient ratios for chicken and pigs come about because they are kept in hated factory farms.
News & Media
This range is lower for efficient design among literate respondents – 0.16 to 0.09.
Science
Furthermore, Sánchez et al. (2003) found that freight costs are lower in efficient ports after controlling for distance, liner service availability, type of product and insurance costs.
A second possibility is that the LNA-spiked primers may be more prone to form secondary structures that will lower the efficient primer concentration available to hybridize to the template.
Science
Polyethylene is slippery, owing to lower co-efficient of friction, hence it allows stylus or sharper objects to pass through the material.
Science
The costs are also shown to be lowered by efficient capital and labor markets that are endogenous to the adoption of hard currency fixes.
Science
We first directly compare SWCNT with MQW absorption nonlinearities, aiming at demonstrating the huge potential of SWCNT-based optical devices for saturable absorption applications as an easier-process and lower-cost efficient solution than conventional semiconductor MQW [10, 11].
Science
The river Hull has served as a navigation and a drainage channel, and has been subject to the conflicts that this usually creates, where water levels need to be raised for navigation, but lowered for efficient drainage.
Wiki
Expert writing Tips
Best practice
When you aim to express that something isn't working at the expected level of efficiency, rely on alternatives like "reduced efficiency" or "suboptimal efficiency".
Common error
Avoid directly combining "lower" with "efficient" as it violates standard English grammar rules for comparative adjectives. Always use "less" to form the comparative of "efficient".
Source & Trust
84%
Authority and reliability
2.8/5
Expert rating
Real-world application tested
Linguistic Context
The phrase "lower efficient" attempts to function as a comparative adjective phrase, aiming to describe something as having a reduced level of efficiency. However, it's not grammatically correct. Ludwig AI confirms that the phrase is not correct English.
Frequent in
Science
67%
News & Media
33%
Formal & Business
0%
Less common in
Encyclopedias
0%
Wiki
0%
Reference
0%
Ludwig's WRAP-UP
The phrase "lower efficient" is generally considered grammatically incorrect. Ludwig AI confirms it is not a correct construction in English. It appears infrequently, mainly in science and news contexts. The intended meaning is to describe something as "less efficient", indicating a comparative reduction in efficiency. For clear and correct communication, especially in formal writing, replacing "lower efficient" with alternatives like "less efficient", "reduced efficiency" or simply "inefficient" is recommended.
More alternative expressions(10)
Phrases that express similar concepts, ordered by semantic similarity:
less efficient
Direct comparison using the standard comparative form of "efficient".
less effective
Focuses on the reduced outcome or result rather than just the process.
suboptimal efficiency
Uses a more formal term to indicate that the efficiency is not ideal.
reduced efficiency
Highlights the decrease in efficiency.
diminished efficiency
Emphasizes that the efficiency has been lessened.
compromised efficiency
Suggests that efficiency has been negatively affected or impaired.
degraded efficiency
Indicates a decline in the level of efficiency.
inefficient
A single word meaning not efficient. This is a more concise alternative.
poor efficiency
Simple and direct way to express low efficiency.
weaker efficiency
Uses "weaker" to describe the efficiency as being less potent or effective.
FAQs
How can I correct the phrase "lower efficient" in a sentence?
The phrase "lower efficient" is grammatically incorrect. Replace it with "less efficient" to properly compare the efficiency of two things.
What does it mean when something is described as "less efficient"?
Describing something as "less efficient" means it requires more resources (time, energy, money) to achieve the same result compared to something else. It performs with reduced productivity.
Is there a single word I can use instead of "lower efficient"?
Yes, the word "inefficient" can be used as a concise alternative to describe something that is not performing at its best in terms of resource use and productivity.
What's the difference between "less efficient" and "more efficient"?
"Less efficient" implies a lower level of productivity and higher resource consumption, while "more efficient" indicates higher productivity and lower resource consumption. The first one is negative, the second one is positive.
Editing plus AI, all in one place.
Stop switching between tools. Your AI writing partner for everything—polishing proposals, crafting emails, finding the right tone.
Table of contents
Usage summary
Human-verified examples
Expert writing tips
Linguistic context
Ludwig's wrap-up
Alternative expressions
FAQs
Source & Trust
84%
Authority and reliability
2.8/5
Expert rating
Real-world application tested