Exact(8)
The organizational behaviorist Barry Staw, in a 1995 study of the N.B.A., showed that high draft picks consistently got more playing time than lower draft picks, regardless of whether their performance justified it.
A good year meant lower draft picks and a more difficult schedule.
Consequently, it results in lower draft, resistance and motions than equivalent length catamarans in most sea states.
As compared with two commercial injection tools, the prototype required lower draft force, caused less soil surface disturbance and produced a larger manure soil mixed zone.
The subsoiler with a bionic element h/s of 0.57 (S-T-H-0.57) had a lower draft requirement (1292.59 N) and a lower total energy requirement (23.48 J) than the other designs.
The results showed that bionic subsoilers with a shank and BTP in the horizontal direction of motion (S-T-H) and tines with the BTP parallel to the centerline (T-T) had lower draft requirements and energy consumption than the other designs.
Similar(52)
Most Valuable Player: Curtis Granderson, OF, Yankees While players like Jacoby Ellsbury (whose average draft position (ADP) according to Mock Draft Central was No. 63), Ryan Braun (ADP 10) and Matt Kemp (ADP 21) have comparably valuable numbers, Granderson (ADP 73) gets the nod in part because of his lower draft-day cost.
It was Randle who got things going for Kentucky coming out of halftime, with a monster putback dunk that signaled there would be no talks about a lowering draft stock after this afternoon's game: With 3.2 seconds left, Kentucky had a 78-76 lead over Wichita State but the Shockers had the ball and a final timeout to draw up a play.
(The lower the draft number someone received, the more likely it was that he would be drafted).
These rates were lower for draft than finished genomes, consistent with higher incidence of sequencing errors and gaps.
However his size and the small school he played for helped lower his draft stock.
Write better and faster with AI suggestions while staying true to your unique style.
Since I tried Ludwig back in 2017, I have been constantly using it in both editing and translation. Ever since, I suggest it to my translators at ProSciEditing.

Justyna Jupowicz-Kozak
CEO of Professional Science Editing for Scientists @ prosciediting.com