Your English writing platform
Discover LudwigSuggestions(1)
Exact(14)
Because of the narrow anatomic relationships, defining a lower cutoff point for SLNs is practically impossible.
Thus, we should choose a lower cutoff point to improve the sensitivity, and to reduce the number of missed CHB patients at high risk for liver fibrogenesis.
Application of this lower cutoff point resulted in a sarcopenia prevalence of 3.1% in our cohort (70 79: 1.8% vs ≥80 years: 7.6%).
The lower cutoff point for fasting plasma glucose concentrations (7.0 mmol/L) was used for cases identified after 1998 according to the American Diabetes Association criteria (23).
It is this correlation coefficient that determines the lower cutoff point on curves showing the dependence of the number clusters on the correlation coefficient threshold employed in the clustering procedure (Fig. 1).
In addition, we used the more recently described IDF criteria (2), with a lower cutoff point for waist circumference, and showed that the association was consistent across both definitions.
Similar(46)
Lower cutoff points of BMI and higher cutoff points of WC and WHR were more appropriate for men.
Using lower cutoff points for the definition of MI as suggested by current recommendations, the rate of chest pain patients with acute MI doubled.
Sensitivity analyses performed for MFS showed that after removing the Kim EAN 2007 study [ 26], heterogeneity was markedly improved, possibly because it included younger patients (average age below 65 years), to whom lower cutoff points were applied (25 and 51).
It is interesting that, comparatively, the number of dissected LN is this study is lower than in most other series, yet it was able to demonstrate a difference in survival using a lower LN cutoff point.
Although age and education significantly predicted the MMSE score in our data, little was gained in prediction by setting a lower failure cutoff point (score <23) for patients over age 80 or with low literacy.
Write better and faster with AI suggestions while staying true to your unique style.
Since I tried Ludwig back in 2017, I have been constantly using it in both editing and translation. Ever since, I suggest it to my translators at ProSciEditing.

Justyna Jupowicz-Kozak
CEO of Professional Science Editing for Scientists @ prosciediting.com