Sentence examples for lower cost-effectiveness from inspiring English sources

When analysis is restricted to interventions delivered from mainstream GP practices, it is more cost-effective (lower cost-effectiveness ratio) to deliver the intervention to the general Australian population rather than the Indigenous population (for the polypill, $11,000 compared to $13,000 DALY/saved).

The probability of supported employment being cost-effective using the NICE lower cost-effectiveness threshold of £20,000/QALY is 67.1%, while at the NICE upper cost-effectiveness threshold of £30,000/QALY, it is 75.2%.

Abbreviations: QALY, quality-adjusted life year; ICER, incremental cost-effectiveness ratio dominated by extended dominance (raloxifene has greater effectiveness and a lower cost-effectiveness ratio) Under base case assumptions, alendronate therapy was more expensive and less effective than raloxifene for all combinations of age (55 to 75) and T-score (-1.0 to -2.4) considered.

A large disparity in spectrum holdings may yield poor results with respect to both objectives, i.e. the lower cost-effectiveness of a larger number of MNOs, and the lower competitive pressure of a smaller number of MNOs.

Regarding gastrectomy for gastric cancer, a robotic approach clearly has advantages including less blood loss and lower postoperative morbidity compared with LG, although robotic gastrectomy requires longer operative time and has lower cost-effectiveness [33, 34].

For instance, even though our results suggest that supplementation has a substantially lower cost-effectiveness ratio, implementation of a universal supplementation program in India has been problematic.

Overall, community and public health interventions such as non-personal interventions for alcohol use, tobacco use, and cardiovascular risks tended to have lower cost effectiveness ratios than many clinical interventions (of varying complexity).

Overall, the community and public health interventions tended to have high benefits and medium level overall costs and tended to have lower cost effectiveness ratios than many of the interventions in the other two categories.

A strategy is "weakly" dominated if a more effective strategy has a lower incremental cost-effectiveness ratio.

A strategy is weakly dominated if there is another more effective program that has a lower incremental cost-effectiveness ratio.

One of the report's recommendations was to lower the cost-effectiveness threshold for immunisation - widescale vaccination against meningitis B had been rejected as being "not cost effective".