low value

USAGE SUMMARY

"low value" is a correct and usable phrase in written English.
It can be used to describe something that has little or no worth. For example, "This old car is of low value, so it's not worth the effort to repair it."

✓ Grammatically correct

News & Media

Science

Human-verified examples from authoritative sources

Exact Expressions

34 human-written examples

I was of low value.

The Guardian - Film

And almost all traffic is low value.

The Guardian - Opinion

This assigns a low value to the waste.

The Guardian

"I've seen a few articles today about the low value of the pound.

The Guardian

Exemptions for low value residential and business properties, (e.g. through a tax-free allowance).

The Guardian

"New everyday low value," huh?

TechCrunch

Human-verified similar examples from authoritative sources

Similar Expressions

26 human-written examples

The researchers called it "low-value care".

The New Yorker

Low-value work decreased by 50%.

The Guardian

That is what low-value health care can be like.

The New Yorker

Luring in high-volume, low-value assembly work is out.

The Economist

Two decades ago the resin had the image of a low-value tourist trinket.

The Guardian - Business

Expert writing Tips

Best practice

When describing the characteristics of something with "low value", be specific about what aspects contribute to its diminished worth. For example, instead of saying "The product is low value", specify "The product is low value due to its poor durability and limited functionality."

Common error

Avoid using "low value" interchangeably with "low price". While related, "low value" implies a broader assessment of worth, considering factors beyond just the monetary cost. Using it incorrectly can misrepresent the intended meaning.

Linguistic Context

The phrase "low value" primarily functions as a descriptive adjective modifying a noun. It indicates that the noun it modifies possesses minimal worth, importance, or significance. As Ludwig AI confirms, the phrase is correct and usable in written English.

Expression frequency: Common

Frequent in

News & Media

48%

Science

42%

Formal & Business

5%

Less common in

Wiki

3%

Encyclopedias

1%

Reference

1%

Ludwig's WRAP-UP

In summary, "low value" is a common and grammatically sound phrase used to describe something lacking in worth, importance, or significance. As Ludwig AI confirms, its usage spans various contexts, including news, science, and business. When writing, it's crucial to consider what factors contribute to something's "low value" to give precision to what you describe. While "low value" can refer to monetary worth or importance, it can be easily confused with "low price", so remember that one is just related to price while the other one is a broader measure of worth.

More alternative expressions

Phrases that express similar concepts, ordered by semantic similarity:

minimal worth

Emphasizes the lack of monetary or intrinsic worth.

inferior quality

Focuses on the quality aspect rather than the overall worth.

poor quality

Similar to inferior quality, but more general.

negligible importance

Highlights the lack of significance or relevance.

little merit

Focuses on the lack of positive attributes or advantages.

devalued asset

Specifically refers to a financial asset that has lost value.

reduced price

Specifically refers to a lower monetary value.

small cost

Refers to the monetary expense being small.

cheaply made

Highlights the poor construction or manufacturing.

unimportant matter

Shifts the focus to the insignificance of the subject.

FAQs

How can I use "low value" in a sentence?

You can use "low value" to describe something that has little worth, such as "The antique had "minimal worth" due to its damaged condition" or "The company focused on eliminating "unimportant matters" to increase efficiency."

What can I say instead of "low value"?

You can use alternatives like "inferior quality", ""minimal worth"", or "negligible importance" depending on the specific context.

Which is correct, "low value" or "low valued"?

"Low value" is generally the correct term. "Low valued" is less common and might be appropriate in specific contexts where you're describing something that has been valued as low by someone or something, like: "The property was "devalued asset" by the assessor."

What's the difference between "low value" and "low price"?

"Low value" refers to something having little worth or importance, while "low price" simply means something is inexpensive. A product can have a low price but still be of good value if it provides sufficient utility or quality for the cost. "Low value" indicates that regardless of the price, the item is not worth much.