Sentence examples for low quality research from inspiring English sources

Accordingly, research evaluation policies discourage publications in other non-mainstream journals under the assumption that they publish low quality research.

In a digital world that doesn't always distinguish between high quality and low quality research, studies with the most provocative findings often get the most views, giving them an aura of validity.

Areas AN and RQ represent erroneous decisions – those in area AN would be selected because of favorable ratings by the reviewers, but as low quality research they would not contribute towards scientific advancement in a research field (this type of error was called type I error above).

Barriers to dissemination described by respondents were research that is not completed (e.g. 55% of research projects in Thailand were not completed) and low quality research (Mauritius).

If American research universities produce low-quality research and have minimal economic impact, why are they the envy of the world?

In fact, the absence of detected low-quality research can be interpreted as the lack of verification activities and thus as a potential limitation to the reliability of a field.

The biggest problem is low-quality research with too few participants, but scientists also don't agree on what vitamin D levels are "adequate" or "inadequate," "sufficient" or "deficient"—or even how to assess levels at all.

They see it as an attempt to undermine a program that biomedical lobbyists have complained is supporting low-quality research at a time when excellent proposals from top scientists are being rejected for lack of funds.

The upgrading plans have been criticized, however, due to low-budget and low-quality research and the unfortunate reality that even successful mapping may only result in low-cost and minor projects to actually improve living conditions.

Despite being widely accepted as the best way to filter low-quality research, to detect flaws in scientific communications and to improve papers with significant contributions to their fields [1] [3], peer review has also raised many criticisms [4] [6].

Concerns expressed include the poor availability of medically trained researchers, a lack of time among clinicians, the low quality of research, patients not getting the new therapies in a timely fashion, commercial biases in the funding and conducting of research and the shifting of drug trials to low income countries.