Your English writing platform
Discover LudwigSuggestions(1)
Exact(1)
Taking the low numbers of items per subscale into account, the QLiS can be regarded as an accurate assessment instrument of subjective quality of life in schizophrenia with good content validity.
Similar(59)
Furthermore, the OBN and VRS dimensions contained a relatively low number of items, and the conceptual breadth of the VRS dimension was considered too narrow.
Furthermore, alpha for these two scales is deflated by a low number of items.
To keep a low number of items, we included only these 3 subscales.
Its relatively low number of items allowed for an economical application in research and clinical work.
Measurement limitations are a low number of items constructing each variable and the reliability of those items.
This may have been due to the low number of items that loaded onto each of these factors.
This is usually the case when a low number of items is considered, leading to highly noise-tolerant biclusters.
This is unsurprising given the multiple dimensions, low number of items and similar variance explained by each component.
A possible reason for this finding is the low number of items included (3 items versus 10 or 11 for Delphi and Megens & Harris lists).
Overall it can be concluded that the different language versions of the CIAD are valid and reliable, despite the relatively low number of items included in the scale.
Write better and faster with AI suggestions while staying true to your unique style.
Since I tried Ludwig back in 2017, I have been constantly using it in both editing and translation. Ever since, I suggest it to my translators at ProSciEditing.

Justyna Jupowicz-Kozak
CEO of Professional Science Editing for Scientists @ prosciediting.com