low level of security

USAGE SUMMARY

The phrase "low level of security" is correct and usable in written English.
It can be used to describe a situation or system that does not provide adequate protection against threats or vulnerabilities. Example: "The company's network was compromised due to a low level of security, allowing unauthorized access to sensitive data."

✓ Grammatically correct

News & Media

Science

Formal & Business

Human-verified examples from authoritative sources

Exact Expressions

5 human-written examples

On Monday, The Albuquerque Journal reported the low level of security for the downloaded data.

The New York Times

He blamed the clashes on poor organisation in the stadium: "Believe me, if that was a Spartak-CSKA game everything would have been much scarier with such a low level of security as there is in France".

The Guardian - Sport

One technical expert, Daniel J. Bernstein, a University of Illinois mathematician who has also developed a version of D.N.S. that does not suffer from the current flaw, said DNSSEC "offers a surprisingly low level of security, while at the same time introducing performance and reliability problems".

The New York Times - Tech

While this is impressive, the researchers also note that it is "unlikely" that any fingerprint sensor operates at such a low level of security.

Vice

Concerns have been compounded by the low level of security surrounding these sources, and there is documented evidence of multiple missing sources [ 70- 72].

Critical Care

Human-verified similar examples from authoritative sources

Similar Expressions

55 human-written examples

Norway has long been an extremely open society, with low levels of security around public figures and institutions, and a feeling that "it won't happen here".

The New Yorker

It was not simply that there may be high levels of corruption and low levels of security, but that people don't build synergies that could help entrepreneurship flourish.

The Guardian

Norway has long been an extremely open society, with low levels of security around public figures and institutions, and a feeling that "it won't happen here". Will the past week change Norway?

The New Yorker

A12 Finding Fault With Terror List Nearly 32,000 terror suspects considered "armed and dangerous" were logged into a master terror watch list at the lowest level of security handling, requiring no immediate action by law enforcement officers who might encounter them on the streets, the inspector general of the Justice Department said.

The New York Times

This is a sign of friendship, not homosexuality". "Restricted" is the lowest level of security classification, but MoD officials feared that terminals at some of Britain's 1,100 military locations were being used by disaffected soldiers to email copies of the documents.

The Guardian

The highest level of security only incorrectly identifies a match 0.01percentt of the time, the middle tier has an FMR of 0.1percentt, and the lowest level of security has an FMR of one percent.

Vice

Expert writing Tips

Best practice

When describing a specific system or location, clearly identify what is lacking in security. For instance, specify if it's a "low level of security" regarding data encryption or physical access control.

Common error

Avoid using "low level of security" without providing context. Always specify the area or aspect of security that is deficient to prevent ambiguity and ensure clarity.

Linguistic Context

The phrase "low level of security" functions primarily as a descriptive noun phrase. It describes the state or condition of a system, environment, or process concerning its protective measures. Ludwig AI confirms this phrase is grammatically correct and usable.

Expression frequency: Common

Frequent in

News & Media

40%

Science

30%

Wiki

15%

Less common in

Formal & Business

10%

Academia

5%

Reference

0%

Ludwig's WRAP-UP

The phrase "low level of security" is a common and grammatically sound way to describe inadequate protective measures. As Ludwig AI confirms, the phrase is broadly applicable across contexts, but most frequently used in news, scientific, and wiki sources. When using this phrase, ensure to provide specific context to avoid ambiguity. Some alternatives include "poor security" or "inadequate security measures". Understanding its implications and proper usage will enhance the clarity and impact of your writing.

More alternative expressions

Phrases that express similar concepts, ordered by semantic similarity:

poor security

Replaces 'level' and 'of' with a more concise adjective.

weak security

Uses a different adjective to describe the quality of security.

inadequate security

Emphasizes the insufficiency of the security measures.

compromised security

Indicates that the security has been breached or weakened.

lax security

Suggests a careless or negligent approach to security.

minimal security

Highlights the limited extent of security measures in place.

insufficient security measures

Rephrases to focus on the 'measures' that are lacking.

deficient security

Indicates a lack or shortage in security provisions.

vulnerable security

Emphasizes the susceptibility to threats and attacks.

tenuous security

Suggests that the security is fragile and easily broken.

FAQs

How can I rephrase "low level of security" to sound more formal?

In formal contexts, consider using phrases like "inadequate security measures", "deficient security protocols", or "compromised security infrastructure".

What are some common causes of a "low level of security"?

A "low level of security" can stem from factors such as outdated software, lack of employee training, insufficient investment in cybersecurity, or failure to implement basic security protocols.

How does "low level of security" differ from "high level of security"?

"Low level of security" indicates a system or environment is poorly protected and vulnerable to threats. Conversely, "high level of security" suggests robust safeguards are in place to prevent unauthorized access and protect assets.

Is it always negative to describe something as having a "low level of security"?

Yes, describing something as having a "low level of security" is almost always negative, implying vulnerability and risk. There are very few contexts where this would be seen as a positive attribute.