Sentence examples for low intensity group from inspiring English sources

The high intensity group was associated with significantly less favourable distant disease-free survival (HR = 1.34, 95% CI 1.04-1.73) compared to the low intensity group.

For automated assessment of Ki-67 intensity the tertile thresholds were: low intensity group from 0 to 49.6 percent, moderate intensity group from 49.7 to 56.6percentt, and high intensity group from 56.7 to 100percentt.

The optimal target range of the INR for patients depends on the type of indication [ 3] and is differentiated to two indication groups by the Dutch National Network of ACs, i.e. low intensity group with INR 2.5-3.5 and high intensity group with INR 3.0-4.0.

SHRs were divided into three groups: low intensity group (LIG; n = 4), which trained at a running velocity corresponding to 20% below MLSS (16 m.min−1), high intensity group (HIG; n = 4), which trained at a velocity corresponding to 15% above the MLSS (23 m.min−1), and control group (CG; n = 4), where the animals were not submitted to exercise.

Since it turned out that the high and low intensity groups did not differ in terms of the rated intensity during the main experiment these groups were lumped together.

We divided eligible patients into low-intensity group (n = 616) and high-intensity group (n = 1,815).

Results: High-intensity group had significantly lower CCU (8.9 % vs 4.1%%; p < 0.001) and hospital (10.9%% vs 6.1%%; p < 0.001) mortality compared to the low-intensity group.

The decrease in CCU (54.5%% vs 22.5 %; p = 0.001) and hospital (57.6 % vs 29.4 %; p = 0.003) mortality in high-intensity group were consistent in 135 (low-intensity group 33, high-intensity group 102) patient with profound cardiogenic shock treated with extracorporeal membrane oxygenation.

In fact, the low-intensity group reported less fatigue than the moderate-intensity group.

After a solid sixteen weeks of training, the results were undeniable: The sprinters lost significant amounts of abdominal and thigh fat, and while the low-intensity group did improve their aerobic fitness, their body fat levels didn't budge any more than the group on the bench.

The group that performed low-amount-high-intensity exercise improved CRF more than the low-amount-low-intensity group.