Sentence examples for low frequency regular from inspiring English sources

Previous LAN studies have not addressed the dissociation between high and low frequency regular forms observed behaviorally.

If, on the other hand, regular forms activate rules independently of full-form access then LANs should occur for both high and low frequency regular participles.

If high frequency regular forms are accessed via full-form activation, rule processes might be activated only for low frequency regular forms and not for high-frequency regular forms.

In addition, it investigates whether electrophysiological responses can confirm the behavioral dissociation between high and low frequency regular forms, by presenting both high and low frequency forms for both regular and irregular forms.

But the mere fact that that there is a difference between low frequency regular and irregular participles supports the hypothesis that those are not processed in exactly the same way.

This appeared to be due to two co-occurring activities from an anterior and a posterior source, visible in the activation pattern in the 300 350 ms time-window and supported by the finding that differences between low frequency regular and irregular participles were significant in left temporal and central posterior electrode clusters in the 350 400 ms window.

In addition, we asked whether a LAN as evidence for rule application can only be found for low-frequency regular forms, as predicted by earlier behavioral studies.

The list included 88 low-frequency irregular words, and 88 low-frequency regular words matched on number of letters, initial phoneme and frequency.

Furthermore, the recognition of low-frequency regular inflections is typically slower and leads to more errors than that of low-frequency irregular inflections, suggesting that low-frequency regular forms are recognized via the decomposition route as decomposition is believed to be slower and more error-prone than full-form activation.

In the current simulation, the network was tested on four sets of test stimuli: high-frequency regular words, low-frequency regular words, high-frequency irregular words and low-frequency irregular words.

Both groups were scanned using the same equipment, analyses and stimuli which included written English words (with both low-frequency regular and irregular spellings), their Italian translations, and pseudowords.