Sentence examples for low familiarity from inspiring English sources

Open image in new window Fig. 6 Arousal and valence classification accuracies above the chance levels for high familiarity (familiar songs), low familiarity (unfamiliar songs), and combined (all songs) data groups from the DEAP dataset.

Open image in new window Fig. 5 Arousal and valence classification accuracies above the chance levels for high familiarity (familiar songs), low familiarity (unfamiliar songs), and combined (all songs) data groups from our dataset.

In particular, the incidence of reported low familiarity was higher than that of high familiarity.

In our case, most of the teachers declared a low familiarity with the NOS, combined with a low scientific competence.

To better balance low and high familiarity sessions, we defined scores 1 2 as low familiarity and 3 5 as high familiarity.

Therefore, high familiarity relationships tend to invoke more informal language, whereas low familiarity relationships are likely to call upon more formal language.

The mean proportions were analyzed with separate 4 (retention interval: immediate, 4, 16, 64 days) × 2 (modality: odor, face) × 2 (familiarity: high familiar, low familiar) mixed ANOVAs, with repeated measures on the last 2 factors.

By contrast, we saw much greater correspondence in the low-familiarity group (compare panels A and B in Fig. 3).

Language domain is assessed using a three-item confrontation naming task with low-familiarity animals, repetition of two syntactically complex sentences, and the fluency task (max 6 points).

By contrast, in the low-familiarity group, a significant difference was only observed when a single food type was present (critical difference at 1% = 21.8, critical difference at 5% = 19.1).

G.M.O.s are at the extreme of that scale, high in dread and possible impact, while being low in familiarity: though an estimated eighty per cent of packaged food in the U.S. contains G.M.O.s, only thirty-five per cent of the population thinks G.M.O.s are safe, according to one recent estimate, and only a quarter say they understand what genetic engineering of food actually entails.