low expenses

USAGE SUMMARY

The phrase 'low expenses' is correct and can be used in written English.
It can be used when referring to costs that are not extremely high. For example, "The business's low expenses gave it an advantage in the market."

✓ Grammatically correct

News & Media

Formal & Business

Science

Human-verified examples from authoritative sources

Exact Expressions

59 human-written examples

500 and is known for low expenses.

The New York Times

All these funds have extremely low expenses.

The New York Times

These funds are penny pinchers, tending to have low expenses.

The New York Times

With low expenses, he lives comfortably, though hardly extravagantly.

The New York Times

Look for funds with low expenses, Ms. Bugbee said.

The New York Times

Then there are funds that have consistently low expenses but offer little convenience.

The New York Times

Low expenses are typically a good sign of future relative performance.

The New York Times

Can you decide what low expenses you need when you come here to work on the script?

The New Yorker

Two factors set the fund apart, Mr. Jacobson said: Mr. Volpert's ability to select quality corporate bonds within the constraints of index investing, and the fund's low expenses.

The New York Times

After all, such funds have low expenses and turnover and often focus on specific market capitalizations and growth or value styles.

The New York Times

Human-verified similar examples from authoritative sources

Similar Expressions

1 human-written examples

*Low expenses.

Forbes

Expert writing Tips

Best practice

When advocating for a product or service, highlight how its "low expenses" translate into long-term savings for the customer.

Common error

Avoid using "cheap" as a direct substitute for "low expenses". "Cheap" can imply poor quality, while "low expenses" simply means costs are minimized, potentially through efficiency and value-driven decisions. For instance, a company with "low expenses" may still offer high-quality products or services.

Linguistic Context

The phrase "low expenses" functions primarily as a noun phrase, where the adjective "low" modifies the noun "expenses". Ludwig AI confirms that the phrase is correct and widely used. It acts as a subject or object in sentences about financial status or cost management.

Expression frequency: Very common

Frequent in

News & Media

57%

Formal & Business

20%

Science

16%

Less common in

Wiki

4%

Encyclopedias

0%

Reference

0%

Ludwig's WRAP-UP

In summary, "low expenses" is a grammatically sound and frequently used phrase that describes minimized costs. Ludwig AI confirms its correctness. Its primary function is to highlight efficiency, profitability, or affordability in various contexts, from business and finance to personal matters. While generally neutral in register, it's crucial to differentiate it from "cheap costs", which may imply compromised quality. When aiming for clarity and precision, alternative phrases like "minimal costs" or "reduced expenditures" can add nuance. The phrase sees frequent use in sources such as The New York Times and Forbes, indicating its relevance in media and business publications.

More alternative expressions

Phrases that express similar concepts, ordered by semantic similarity:

minimal costs

Focuses on the idea that costs are at the smallest possible amount.

reduced expenditures

Highlights the action of decreasing the amount of money spent.

lean expenses

Emphasizes efficiency and the absence of unnecessary costs.

cost-effective spending

Focuses on spending money in a way that provides good value.

economical outlays

Stresses the careful and thrifty nature of the spending.

budget-friendly costs

Highlights that costs are designed to be affordable within a budget.

thrifty spending

Emphasizes the characteristic of being careful with money.

modest expenses

Indicates that expenses are limited and not excessive.

controlled costs

Stresses that expenses are actively being managed to keep them down.

lower overhead

Specifically refers to the reduced indirect costs of running a business.

FAQs

How can I rephrase "low expenses" in a business context?

In a business context, you can use phrases like "minimal costs", "reduced expenditures", or "cost-effective spending" to convey the idea of minimized expenses.

What's the difference between "low expenses" and "cheap costs"?

"Low expenses" generally implies efficient cost management, while "cheap costs" can suggest compromised quality. It's a matter of connotation; "low expenses" is often seen as a positive attribute, indicating smart financial practices, whereas "cheap costs" may raise concerns about the value or durability of a product or service.

When is it appropriate to use the term "low expenses"?

Use "low expenses" when you want to emphasize the fact that costs are minimized, whether due to efficient practices, strategic choices, or other factors. It's suitable in financial reports, business plans, and discussions about budgeting or cost management.

What are some strategies for maintaining "low expenses" in a startup?

Strategies include prioritizing essential spending, negotiating favorable terms with suppliers, leveraging technology to automate processes, and minimizing overhead costs by using co-working spaces or remote work arrangements. Focusing on "lean expenses" from the outset is crucial.