Used and loved by millions

Since I tried Ludwig back in 2017, I have been constantly using it in both editing and translation. Ever since, I suggest it to my translators at ProSciEditing.

Justyna Jupowicz-Kozak quote

Justyna Jupowicz-Kozak

CEO of Professional Science Editing for Scientists @ prosciediting.com

MitStanfordHarvardAustralian Nationa UniversityNanyangOxford

loved for him

Grammar usage guide and real-world examples

USAGE SUMMARY

The phrase "loved for him" is not correct and does not convey a clear meaning in written English.
It may be intended to express affection or admiration for someone on behalf of another person, but the construction is awkward and unclear. Example: "She was loved for him, but it was difficult to understand the depth of their relationship."

⚠ May contain grammatical issues

News & Media

Wiki

Human-verified examples from authoritative sources

Exact Expressions

9 human-written examples

"I would have loved for him to have seen this".

News & Media

The New Yorker

"I would have loved for him to become pope".

News & Media

The New York Times

"My father and I were close, so I don't have a lot of regrets," Mr. Selleck said, "but I would have loved for him to be here tonight.

News & Media

The New York Times

"I would have loved for him to be here," Brown said of Iverson, the Philadelphia 76ers point guard with whom he seems to be locked in an eternal power struggle.

"He's a great guy, fully committed and I would've loved for him to get a last-minute winner in his last game.

News & Media

BBC

"He has been an excellent servant to our club," manager Wayne Burnett said. . "I would have loved for him to stay, just like many of our supporters, but we must respect his desire to play at the highest level".

News & Media

BBC
Show more...

Human-verified similar examples from authoritative sources

Similar Expressions

51 human-written examples

"I would love for him to stay.

"We'd love for him to get in touch".

News & Media

Independent

"I would love for him to be successful".

News & Media

The New York Times

"We'd love for him to be a huge weapon.

"I would love for him to be 3 for 3 and we have a big lead.

News & Media

The New York Times
Show more...

Expert writing Tips

Best practice

When expressing the sentiment of someone being loved, opt for clearer and more grammatically sound alternatives like "loved by him" or "cherished by him".

Common error

Avoid using "loved for him" as it can sound unnatural and confusing. Instead, choose more direct and widely accepted alternatives to ensure your writing is clear and easily understood.

Antonio Rotolo, PhD - Digital Humanist | Computational Linguist | CEO @Ludwig.guru

Antonio Rotolo, PhD

Digital Humanist | Computational Linguist | CEO @Ludwig.guru

Source & Trust

87%

Authority and reliability

2.8/5

Expert rating

Real-world application tested

Linguistic Context

The phrase "loved for him" functions as a descriptive phrase, aiming to convey that someone is the recipient of affection. However, its non-standard structure results in awkwardness and reduced clarity. As noted by Ludwig AI, it is grammatically incorrect.

Expression frequency: Uncommon

Frequent in

News & Media

44%

Wiki

22%

Encyclopedias

11%

Less common in

Science

11%

Formal & Business

0%

Academia

0%

Ludwig's WRAP-UP

In summary, while the phrase "loved for him" attempts to express affection or admiration, it is generally considered grammatically incorrect and stylistically awkward. As noted by Ludwig AI, clearer alternatives like "loved by him" or "cherished by him" are preferred. Although examples can be found across various sources, particularly in news and media, adopting these more conventional phrases enhances clarity and ensures effective communication. Avoiding "loved for him" will improve the overall quality and professionalism of your writing.

FAQs

How can I rephrase "loved for him" to sound more natural?

Instead of "loved for him", use phrases like "loved by him", "cherished by him", or "adored by him" to convey the same meaning with better grammatical structure.

Is "loved for him" grammatically correct?

No, "loved for him" is not considered grammatically correct in standard English. It's better to use phrases like "loved by him" or similar alternatives.

What does "loved for him" mean?

While the intended meaning might be understandable, "loved for him" is an awkward and non-standard way to express that someone is the recipient of love. Using clearer phrasing like "loved by him" is recommended.

Which is a better phrase, "loved for him" or "loved by him"?

"Loved by him" is a much better and grammatically correct phrase compared to "loved for him". The former clearly indicates who is loved, while the latter is awkward and unclear.

ChatGPT power + Grammarly precisionChatGPT power + Grammarly precision
ChatGPT + Grammarly

Editing plus AI, all in one place.

Stop switching between tools. Your AI writing partner for everything—polishing proposals, crafting emails, finding the right tone.

Source & Trust

87%

Authority and reliability

2.8/5

Expert rating

Real-world application tested

Most frequent sentences: