lots has been

USAGE SUMMARY

The phrase "lots has been" is not correct in standard written English.
The correct form would be "a lot has been" or "lots have been," depending on the context. Example: "A lot has been accomplished this year in terms of project development."

⚠ May contain grammatical issues

News & Media

Science

Human-verified examples from authoritative sources

Exact Expressions

10 human-written examples

Divining whether the turnaround of Big Lots has been priced into the stock yet depends on whom you ask.

The New York Times

Lots has been written about the "Internet of Things" and how it will change society for the better.

The Guardian - Tech

One of the subdivision's 13 lots has been sold to a neighbor, and the remaining 12, which range in size from a half acre to an acre, are to be developed with an eclectic mix of houses, "just as you would see a mix of styles in old neighborhoods," Mr. Muhlbauer said.

The New York Times

Lots has been written about that.

TechCrunch

Lots has been said about the supposedly amazing way people will interact with the Apple Tablet.

TechCrunch

The drawing of lots has been postponed until Thursday, having originally been pencilled in for Wednesday evening.

BBC

Human-verified similar examples from authoritative sources

Similar Expressions

49 human-written examples

Empty parking lots have been transformed into apartment buildings.

The New York Times

In New York's two large airports, parking lots have been closed near terminals.

The Economist

The lots had been patrolled to see if anybody harvested the stuff, but nobody did.

The New Yorker

In other cities, high-rise buildings, let alone parking lots, have been sold off or demolished.

The New York Times

Therefore, lots have been done on discrete-time population models.

Advances in Difference Equations

Expert writing Tips

Best practice

Always use "a lot has been" or "lots have been" instead of "lots has been" to ensure grammatical correctness. Consider the context to decide whether a singular or plural verb form is appropriate.

Common error

Avoid using "lots has been" because "lots" is plural and requires a plural verb form. Instead, use "lots have been" or rephrase the sentence to use "a lot has been" for grammatical accuracy.

Linguistic Context

The phrase "lots has been" is intended to function as a statement indicating that a significant amount of something has occurred or been done. However, it presents a grammatical error with subject-verb disagreement, as noted by Ludwig. The correct usage would be "a lot has been" or "lots have been".

Expression frequency: Uncommon

Frequent in

News & Media

50%

Science

40%

Formal & Business

10%

Less common in

Academia

0%

Encyclopedias

0%

Wiki

0%

Ludwig's WRAP-UP

In summary, the phrase "lots has been" is grammatically incorrect. As Ludwig AI points out, the proper forms are "a lot has been" or "lots have been", depending on whether a singular or plural sense is intended. While the phrase appears in various contexts, including News & Media and Science, its incorrect grammar makes it unsuitable for formal writing. Alternatives such as "much has been" or "a great deal has been" offer more professional and grammatically sound options. It's essential to ensure subject-verb agreement to maintain clarity and credibility in your writing.

More alternative expressions

Phrases that express similar concepts, ordered by semantic similarity:

a lot has been

Replaces "lots" with "a lot" to correct the grammatical structure, maintaining the meaning of a considerable amount.

much has been

Substitutes "lots" with "much" for a more formal and grammatically sound expression.

a great deal has been

Replaces "lots" with "a great deal" to convey a similar meaning with improved grammar.

plenty has been

Uses "plenty" instead of "lots" to maintain the sense of abundance while correcting the grammar.

a good deal has been

Replaces "lots" with "a good deal" for a more grammatically acceptable alternative.

numerous things have been

Restructures the sentence to emphasize individual items rather than a collective "lots", correcting the grammatical error.

many things have been

Uses "many things" to replace "lots" for grammatical correctness and emphasis on multiple items.

several things have been

Replaces "lots" with "several things" to offer a grammatically sound alternative, indicating more than a few.

various things have been

Substitutes "lots" with "various things" to correct grammar and highlight the diversity of items.

considerable effort has been

Modifies the sentence to focus on effort rather than quantity, while ensuring grammatical accuracy.

FAQs

What is the correct way to say "lots has been"?

The correct way to phrase this is either "a lot has been" (singular) or "lots have been" (plural), depending on the context.

Can I use "lots has been" in formal writing?

No, "lots has been" is grammatically incorrect. Use "a lot has been" or "lots have been" for formal contexts to ensure accuracy.

What's the difference between "lots have been" and "a lot has been"?

"Lots have been" implies multiple, distinct items or actions, while "a lot has been" refers to a singular, collective amount. The choice depends on the intended meaning.

What are some alternatives to "lots has been" that sound more professional?

Consider using phrases like "much has been", "a great deal has been", or "considerable effort has been" for a more professional tone.