lost with rainwater

USAGE SUMMARY

The phrase "lost with rainwater" is not correct and may cause confusion in written English.
It could be used in a context where something is overwhelmed or obscured by rainwater, but it lacks clarity. Example: "The documents were lost with rainwater after the flood damaged the storage room."

⚠ May contain grammatical issues

Science

News & Media

Wiki

Human-verified examples from authoritative sources

Exact Expressions

1 human-written examples

However, traditional Se fertilizer tended to be lost with rainwater and caused Se pollution.

Carbon

Human-verified similar examples from authoritative sources

Similar Expressions

59 human-written examples

"There's these municipalities that say, 'Oh, no, we don't want you to flush our toilets with rainwater because we'll lose budget money on it,'" Crawford said.

The Guardian

It was filled with rainwater.

The New Yorker

Sedimentary rock interacts with rainwater.

The Guardian - Opinion

Some of the newer ditches have filled with rainwater.

The New York Times

"I am walking, my shoes are covered with rainwater.

The New York Times

The red stone floor is slick with rainwater.

The New York Times

Then, they might move on to water, with rainwater capture.

The Guardian

The smallest ones showered it with sand and dirt and then sprinkled it with rainwater.

The New Yorker

The artificial ponds are empty except when they flood with rainwater.

The New York Times

The picture looks like a shot taken through glass panes with rainwater running down.

The New York Times - Arts

Expert writing Tips

Best practice

When describing how rain affects an object, use stronger verbs like "washed away", "flooded", or "soaked" to create a clearer and more vivid image than using the phrase "lost with rainwater".

Common error

Avoid using passive constructions with "lost" and "rainwater" when describing the impact of rain. Instead of saying something was "lost with rainwater", clearly state what happened to the object using active verbs (e.g., "the fertilizer washed away by the rain").

Linguistic Context

The phrase "lost with rainwater" functions as part of a clause intended to describe the effect of rainwater on an object or substance. However, Ludwig AI indicates that the phrase is not correct and needs a more precise form. Alternative suggestions could be washed away by, flooded with or swept away by.

Expression frequency: Rare

Frequent in

Science

33%

News & Media

33%

Wiki

33%

Less common in

Formal & Business

0%

Encyclopedias

0%

Reference

0%

Ludwig's WRAP-UP

In summary, while the phrase "lost with rainwater" aims to describe the effect of rain, it is not considered grammatically correct and can lead to ambiguity. As Ludwig AI points out, it's better to use clearer and more direct alternatives such as "washed away by rainwater", "flooded with rainwater", or "swept away by rainwater". Although examples exist across various contexts like science, news, and general knowledge, it's advisable to use more precise and widely accepted phrasing for effective communication. Using stronger verbs and active constructions will improve the clarity and impact of your writing.

More alternative expressions

Phrases that express similar concepts, ordered by semantic similarity:

washed away by rainwater

Focuses on the action of being carried away by rainwater.

carried off by rainwater

Highlights the transportation aspect of rainwater.

swept away by rainwater

Emphasizes the force and thoroughness of the rainwater's action.

drained away by rainwater

Focuses on the removal of something by rainwater through a drainage system.

carried by rainwater

A more general term for something being transported by rainwater.

disappeared in rainwater

Highlights the disappearance or obscuring of something due to rainwater.

dissolved by rainwater

Indicates that something has been broken down or disintegrated by rainwater.

flooded with rainwater

Focuses on the inundation of an area or object by rainwater.

soaked by rainwater

Emphasizes the saturation of something with rainwater.

tainted by rainwater

Focuses on the contamination or spoiling of something by rainwater.

FAQs

What can I say instead of "lost with rainwater"?

You can use alternatives like "washed away by rainwater", "carried off by rainwater", or "swept away by rainwater" depending on the context.

Is "lost with rainwater" grammatically correct?

The phrase "lost with rainwater" is not considered grammatically correct in standard English. It's better to use more precise phrases that clearly describe the action, such as "washed away by the rain" or "flooded due to rainwater."

How to use "washed away by rainwater" in a sentence?

You can use "washed away by rainwater" in a sentence like: "The topsoil was washed away by rainwater during the heavy storm."

What's the difference between "lost with rainwater" and "flooded with rainwater"?

"Lost with rainwater" is generally not a preferred phrase. "Flooded with rainwater" indicates that an area or object is covered or overwhelmed by rainwater, while the idea someone is trying to express with "lost with rainwater" is something disappeared due to the rain.