loss of clean

USAGE SUMMARY

The phrase "loss of clean" is not correct and does not convey a clear meaning in written English.
It may be intended to refer to the loss of cleanliness or purity, but as it stands, it lacks clarity and context. Example: "The loss of clean water sources has become a significant environmental issue."

⚠ May contain grammatical issues

News & Media

Science

Wiki

Human-verified examples from authoritative sources

Exact Expressions

5 human-written examples

Apparently, personal injury, loss of clean air and water, and the long-term damage to rural industries like agriculture, forestry and recreation are not highly regarded.

The New York Times

The loss of clean water supplies is leading to a resurgence in illness, particularly in areas where wells have dried up, but there are small amounts of surface water in the ponds that dot rural Bangladesh.

The Guardian

Statisticians, say this school, should continue to try to value whatever they reasonably can; but they may have to accept that degradation (such as the loss of clean air or nice views) cannot be included in national accounts.After all the bargaining is done, greens may be disappointed with the result.

The Economist

Many more have died indirectly, from the loss of clean drinking water, healthcare, and nutrition.

Huffington Post

Despite negative publicity for fossil fuels (coal mine disasters, costly oil spills, mountaintop removals, loss of clean water from fracking and high prices at the pump), Flintstonians are invested, often quite literally, in fossil fuels and they fear economic upheaval in the transition to sustainable, non-polluting energy sources.

Huffington Post

Human-verified similar examples from authoritative sources

Similar Expressions

54 human-written examples

Yet, (and at the risk of raising some ire among readers), when a hurricane strikes a heavily populated region of the United States causing death, injury, temporary loss of power, clean water, and sanitation to many, a cry rightfully goes out to address that situation immediately.

Huffington Post

Also, it can be observed that for a minimal average loss in case of clean speech for both clean and multi-condition training, an improvement is obtained with the proposed features for all the noise conditions.

EURASIP Journal on Audio, Speech, and Music Processing

Facing the growing global challenges of climate change, biodiversity loss, pollution, scarcity of clean water and other resources, it's clear that if we keep taking from nature ad infinitum, we risk an unstable, conflict-ridden future.

Huffington Post

The genetic knockout approach, while providing clean loss-of-function models to infer gene functions, has major limitations with site-specificity, i.e., most cytokine or cytokine receptor knockout models available now target the whole body instead of a specific tissue or cell type.

Aging

Bowoto, they will claim, was peacefully protesting the loss of fish and clean water in the area.

Forbes

The best way to rid of foreign substances and bacteria which may be prolonging the voice loss is to drink plenty of clean water.

WikiHow

Expert writing Tips

Best practice

Instead of "loss of clean", use more specific and grammatically correct phrases like "loss of cleanliness" or "decline in purity" to enhance clarity.

Common error

Using "loss of clean" can be confusing. Instead of saying, for example, "the loss of clean water", clarify with "the loss of clean drinking water" or "the pollution of clean water sources" to specify what is being affected.

Linguistic Context

The phrase "loss of clean" is grammatically questionable. It functions as a noun phrase attempting to describe a deprivation of cleanliness or purity. Ludwig AI indicates that the phrase is not correct and suggests alternatives for clarity.

Expression frequency: Rare

Frequent in

News & Media

40%

Science

35%

Wiki

25%

Less common in

Formal & Business

0%

Encyclopedias

0%

Reference

0%

Ludwig's WRAP-UP

In summary, while the phrase "loss of clean" attempts to convey a reduction in cleanliness or purity, it is not grammatically correct and can lead to ambiguity. Ludwig AI suggests that this phrase is incorrect and requires rephrasing. Better alternatives include "loss of cleanliness", "decline in purity", or more specific phrases tailored to the context, such as "loss of clean water supply" or "air pollution increase". Although the phrase appears in various sources like the New York Times and The Guardian, its infrequent use and grammatical issues suggest avoiding it in formal writing.

More alternative expressions

Phrases that express similar concepts, ordered by semantic similarity:

decline in cleanliness

Focuses on the process of becoming less clean, rather than the state of having lost cleanliness.

reduction in purity

Emphasizes the diminishing state of being unadulterated or pure.

compromised cleanliness

Indicates that cleanliness has been negatively affected or endangered.

impairment of hygiene

Highlights the negative impact on health and sanitation.

deterioration of sanitation

Focuses on the decaying condition of sanitary measures and systems.

degradation of hygiene

Highlights the decline in the quality of hygienic practices and conditions.

erosion of purity

Suggests a gradual wearing away of the state of being pure.

worsening of sanitation

Describes the act of sanitary conditions and practices getting worse.

contamination incident

Refers to a specific event leading to a loss of cleanliness, particularly in a localized area.

pollution increase

Addresses the increase in pollutants, thereby reducing the state of being clean.

FAQs

How can I rephrase "loss of clean" to be grammatically correct?

You can use alternatives like "loss of cleanliness", "decline in purity", or "reduction in hygiene" depending on the context.

Is "loss of clean water" grammatically sound?

While understandable, it's better to say "loss of clean water supply" or "contamination of water" for clarity.

What's the difference between "loss of clean" and "loss of cleanliness"?

"Loss of clean" is not grammatically standard. "Loss of cleanliness" is the correct and more common way to express a reduction in the state of being clean.

What can I say instead of "loss of clean air"?

Consider alternatives like "decline in air quality", "air pollution increase", or "worsening air quality" for more precise communication.