Used and loved by millions

Since I tried Ludwig back in 2017, I have been constantly using it in both editing and translation. Ever since, I suggest it to my translators at ProSciEditing.

Justyna Jupowicz-Kozak quote

Justyna Jupowicz-Kozak

CEO of Professional Science Editing for Scientists @ prosciediting.com

MitStanfordHarvardAustralian Nationa UniversityNanyangOxford

loss less

Grammar usage guide and real-world examples

USAGE SUMMARY

The phrase "loss less" is not correct in written English; it should be "lossless." You can use "lossless" in contexts related to data compression, audio, or image formats where no data is lost during the process.
Example: "The new software uses a lossless compression algorithm to ensure that the quality of the images remains intact."

⚠ May contain grammatical issues

Science

News & Media

Human-verified examples from authoritative sources

Exact Expressions

49 human-written examples

"We're talking about subtle effects: hyperactivity, hearing loss, less ability to learn".

News & Media

The New York Times

Bilic admitted: "When they had the ball, he makes that one-player loss less visible.

"Doesn't make her loss less real to have it depicted by another".

News & Media

The New York Times

The use of robots has been linked to less blood loss, less pain after surgery, and faster recovery.

News & Media

The New Yorker

MF Global collapsed at an astonishing speed when it reported a $192m quarterly loss less than a week ago.

Weight-loss surgery in appropriate patients can lead to long-term weight loss, less diabetes and a lower death rate.

News & Media

The New York Times
Show more...

Human-verified similar examples from authoritative sources

Similar Expressions

11 human-written examples

Numerical simulation for the quarter wave transformer couplers with SWG circuit geometry shown the return-loss less than −20 dB for the 5% frequency band.

Elastic layered waveguide is assumed to be loss-less.

They are able to transfer energy almost loss-less over large distances.

The headphone capabilities include "native MP3 decoding for loss-less direct streaming from many advanced music phones".

News & Media

TechCrunch

There are also considerable changes on the back-end, which supports full loss-less translation of data.

News & Media

TechCrunch
Show more...

Expert writing Tips

Best practice

When aiming for grammatical correctness, replace "loss less" with "lossless" particularly in technical contexts like data compression or signal transmission where the aim is to preserve all original data.

Common error

Avoid using "loss less" when you intend to describe something that retains all original data or quality. "Less" implies a reduction, whereas "lossless" indicates complete preservation.

Antonio Rotolo, PhD - Digital Humanist | Computational Linguist | CEO @Ludwig.guru

Antonio Rotolo, PhD

Digital Humanist | Computational Linguist | CEO @Ludwig.guru

Source & Trust

81%

Authority and reliability

3.2/5

Expert rating

Real-world application tested

Linguistic Context

The phrase "loss less" is generally intended to modify a noun, indicating a reduction or minimization of loss. However, according to Ludwig AI, the phrase is grammatically incorrect. The correct term is lossless, particularly in technical contexts.

Expression frequency: Very common

Frequent in

Science

54%

News & Media

36%

Formal & Business

3%

Less common in

Wiki

1%

Encyclopedias

0%

Reference

0%

Ludwig's WRAP-UP

The phrase "loss less" is frequently encountered across diverse sources, particularly in scientific and news contexts. However, Ludwig AI indicates that it's generally considered grammatically incorrect. The correct and more precise term is "lossless," especially in technical scenarios where the preservation of original data or quality is crucial. For situations where loss is reduced but not entirely eliminated, alternatives like "reduced loss" or "minimal loss" offer better clarity. Therefore, while commonly used, writers should exercise caution and opt for more grammatically sound alternatives.

FAQs

Is it grammatically correct to say "loss less"?

No, "loss less" is generally considered grammatically incorrect. The correct term to use, especially in technical contexts, is "lossless", which means without any loss of data or quality.

When should I use "lossless" instead of "loss less"?

Use "lossless" when referring to processes or formats that do not result in any data loss, such as lossless audio compression or lossless image formats. "Loss less" is not a recognized term.

What does "lossless" mean in the context of data compression?

In data compression, "lossless" means that the compressed data can be perfectly reconstructed to match the original data exactly. There is no degradation in quality or information.

Are there situations where a phrase similar to "loss less" could be appropriate?

While "loss less" itself is not standard, you might use phrases like "reduced loss" or "minimal loss" to indicate that the amount of loss has been decreased, but not eliminated entirely. Consider "The goal is "reduced loss", not necessarily lossless operation."

ChatGPT power + Grammarly precisionChatGPT power + Grammarly precision
ChatGPT + Grammarly

Editing plus AI, all in one place.

Stop switching between tools. Your AI writing partner for everything—polishing proposals, crafting emails, finding the right tone.

Source & Trust

81%

Authority and reliability

3.2/5

Expert rating

Real-world application tested

Most frequent sentences: