lose universality

USAGE SUMMARY

The phrase "lose universality" is correct and usable in written English.
It can be used in contexts discussing concepts, theories, or principles that are becoming less applicable or relevant to a broader audience or situation. Example: "As the technology evolves, we may find that certain ethical guidelines begin to lose universality across different cultures."

✓ Grammatically correct

Science

News & Media

Human-verified examples from authoritative sources

Exact Expressions

1 human-written examples

In order to facilitate theoretical analysis and not to lose universality, we assume that ({boldsymbol {f}}_{0} x,y,t))=({boldsymbol {g}}^{0} x,y) =boldsymbol {0}) and (varpi x,y,t)=0) in the following study.

Journal of Inequalities and Applications

Human-verified similar examples from authoritative sources

Similar Expressions

57 human-written examples

Ollie is referred to by another instructor as the "short-haired hippy", and at one point I spot a whiteboard on which he has written: "When ego is lost, universality exists".

The Guardian - Lifestyle

For convenience and without losing universality, we assume that (psi x,y,t)=psi_{0} x,y)=psi_{1} x, y)=0) and (varepsilon=gamma=1) in the following discussion.

Boundary Value Problems

For the sake of simplicity and without losing universality, we suppose that (boldsymbol {sigma}_{0}(boldsymbol {z},t)=boldsymbol {0}) and (boldsymbol {u}_{0}(boldsymbol {z},t)=boldsymbol {0}) in the subsequent analysis.

Boundary Value Problems

As divergent forces tug at the internet, it is in danger of losing its universality and splintering into separate digital domains.The internet is as much a trade pact as an invention.

The Economist

But when a clear cut case like the treatment of Tymosheknko presents itself and where Britain has such leverage over the Euro 2012, it is sad that the government is so silent and the cause of human rights loses its universality.

The Guardian - Opinion

Freedom is universal in the proper sense because, unlike happiness, it can be understood in such a way that it is susceptible to specification without losing its universality.

SEP

One might still object that this freedom of choice is incapable of being the basis of a pure principle of right for the same reason that happiness was incapable of being its basis, namely, that it is too vague in itself and that when specified by the particular decisions individuals make with their free choice, it loses its universality.

SEP

Which is why the coalition's assault on universality, represented by the ditching of child benefit for the better-off, is about far more than the 15% of families who will lose out directly.

The Guardian - Opinion

Still, if the internet loses too much of its universality, cautions Mr Werbach of the Wharton School, it may indeed fall apart, just as world trade can collapse if there is too much protectionism.

The Economist

But the net is losing some of its openness and universality.That's not always a bad thing.

The Economist

Expert writing Tips

Best practice

When using "lose universality", ensure the context clearly indicates what is becoming less universally applicable. Provide specific examples to illustrate the narrowing scope.

Common error

Avoid using "lose universality" without specifying the domain or context in which the universality is being diminished. Be precise about the factors contributing to this loss.

Linguistic Context

The phrase "lose universality" functions as a verb phrase followed by a noun, typically used to describe the diminishing scope or general applicability of a concept, principle, or theory. Ludwig confirms this usage, indicating it is grammatically sound.

Expression frequency: Rare

Frequent in

Science

50%

News & Media

50%

Formal & Business

0%

Less common in

Encyclopedias

0%

Wiki

0%

Reference

0%

Ludwig's WRAP-UP

In summary, "lose universality" is a grammatically correct phrase used to describe the diminishing scope or general applicability of a concept, principle, or theory. Ludwig AI confirms this assessment. While relatively rare, the phrase appears in both scientific and news contexts, suggesting a neutral register. When using this phrase, it's important to clearly define what is losing universality and the factors contributing to this shift. Alternatives include "diminish in scope" or "become less relevant".

More alternative expressions

Phrases that express similar concepts, ordered by semantic similarity:

diminish in scope

Emphasizes the narrowing of the range to which something applies.

become less relevant

Focuses on the decline in importance or applicability.

narrow in application

Highlights the reduced range of practical use.

decline in generality

Points to a decrease in the quality of being widespread or common.

become more specific

Indicates a shift towards being less broad and more focused.

erode in widespread acceptance

Suggests a gradual decline in how widely something is agreed upon or used.

suffer from limited applicability

Highlights the constraints on where something can be effectively applied.

lose its broad appeal

Focuses on a decrease in the attractiveness to a wide range of people or situations.

become particularized

Highlights the increasing specificity and decreasing generality.

contract in breadth

Implies a reduction in the range or extent of something.

FAQs

How can I use "lose universality" in a sentence?

You can use "lose universality" when discussing a concept, theory, or principle that is becoming less applicable or relevant across a broader range of situations. For example: "As technology evolves, certain ethical guidelines may "begin to lose universality" across different cultures."

What does it mean for something to "lose universality"?

When something "loses universality", it means it becomes less broadly applicable or accepted. Its relevance narrows, and it might only apply to specific situations or contexts instead of general ones.

What are some alternatives to "lose universality"?

Alternatives include "diminish in scope", "become less relevant", or "narrow in application". The best choice depends on the specific context.

Is it always negative for something to "lose universality"?

Not necessarily. While "losing universality" can indicate a problem, it can also reflect a natural evolution or specialization. For instance, a general theory might "become more specific" to address particular cases, which isn't inherently negative.