Exact(1)
This was a retrospective longitudinal database analysis with a study period between January 2008 and March 2012.
Similar(59)
With approval and assistance from Statistics Sweden and the Center for Epidemiology Swedish National Board of Health and Welfaree), a 43-year (1960 2003) longitudinal database, the Longitudinal Multilevel Analysis of Scania (LOMAS), has been assembled, which includes all the inhabitants in the county of Scania (about one million).
Our project will include a thorough validation of primary data, the linkage of various databases into one large longitudinal database, an in-depth epidemiological analysis and a careful interpretation and dissemination of the results to assist the decision-making process of clinicians, researchers and policymakers in transfusion medicine.
This study will include the thorough validation of the primary data if needed, the linkage of the various databases into one large longitudinal database, an in-depth epidemiological analysis to answer our questions, and a careful interpretation and dissemination of the results to assist the decision-making process of clinicians, researchers and policymakers in transfusion medicine.
A retrospective database analysis was conducted using a longitudinal electronic medical records database (IMS Disease Analyzer).
A retrospective analysis was conducted using the IMS Disease Analyzer, a longitudinal database containing anonymised patient records maintained by 650 general practitioners (GPs) treating 2.5 million patients in the UK and 400 GPs and internists treating 2.4 million patients in Germany.
Questionnaire data were entered into a longitudinal database (initially Epi Info version 6.02b, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Atlanta, GA, USA; and subsequently Microsoft Access, Microsoft, Redmond, WA, USA) for storage and analysis.
Setting: A prospective, longitudinal database.
Design: Observational database analysis.
DESIGN: Observational database analysis.
DESIGN: Retrospective database analysis.
Write better and faster with AI suggestions while staying true to your unique style.
Since I tried Ludwig back in 2017, I have been constantly using it in both editing and translation. Ever since, I suggest it to my translators at ProSciEditing.

Justyna Jupowicz-Kozak
CEO of Professional Science Editing for Scientists @ prosciediting.com