longer proceed with

USAGE SUMMARY

The phrase "longer proceed with" is not correct in English.
Did you mean "no longer proceed with"? You can use the corrected phrase when indicating that you will stop or cease a particular action or process. Example: "Due to unforeseen circumstances, we will no longer proceed with the project as planned."

⚠ May contain grammatical issues

News & Media

Science

Wiki

Human-verified examples from authoritative sources

Exact Expressions

3 human-written examples

A group of about 35 people used an area near the parking lot to deliver a message of disapproval directed at both Mr. Strauss-Kahn and Cyrus R. Vance Jr., the Manhattan district attorney, whose prosecutors said that questions about the credibility of Mr. Strauss-Kahn's accuser, Nafissatou Diallo, meant they could no longer proceed with her case.

The New York Times

The Lloyds statement said: "The Co-operative Group's board has decided that they can no longer proceed with a purchase of the Verde business given their view of the impact of the current economic environment, the worsened outlook for economic growth and the increasing regulatory requirements on the financial services sector in general".

BBC

Interestingly, the CPS only contacted the group to inform them that they could no longer proceed with the case after the six-month deadline for public prosecutions to be brought in summary cases.

Vice

Human-verified similar examples from authoritative sources

Similar Expressions

57 human-written examples

It causes Sallie Mae irreparable harm for these competitors to wield any power over Sallie Mae when they are no longer willing to proceed with the transaction as agreed".

The New York Times

If firms such as WorldCom, Kingston and Thus no longer want to proceed with co-location, that is their commercial decision they can always change their mind later on.

The Economist

All of this technology represents the next step in the entertainment space, and will allow performers who are no longer living, to proceed with their careers.

Huffington Post

For reasons unconnected with the present study, development work on this specific formulation is no longer proceeding.

Respiratory Medicine

Science no longer proceeds this way.

Huffington Post

The committee had met the Chapter of St Paul's, the church's governing body at 11am, she explained: "We were informed that they will no longer be proceeding with legal action against us".

The Guardian

No longer will science and medicine proceed with deep uncertainty over how many genes relate to a particular process.

The New York Times

As a result, Mr. Howe told a judge this month that there was no longer enough admissible evidence to proceed with 49 charges, including 23 felonies.

The New York Times

Expert writing Tips

Best practice

Avoid using the phrase "longer proceed with" due to its grammatical incorrectness. Always use "no longer proceed with" or a similar grammatically sound alternative.

Common error

A common mistake is to use "longer proceed with" when the intended meaning is to indicate that an action will not continue. Ensure that the word "no" precedes "longer" to form the correct phrase "no longer proceed with".

Linguistic Context

The phrase "longer proceed with" functions as an incorrect verb phrase. It attempts to express the cessation of an action but fails due to the missing negative particle "no". As Ludwig AI suggests, the correct form is "no longer proceed with".

Expression frequency: Rare

Frequent in

News & Media

33%

Science

33%

Wiki

33%

Less common in

Formal & Business

0%

Encyclopedias

0%

Academia

0%

Ludwig's WRAP-UP

In summary, the phrase "longer proceed with" is grammatically incorrect and should be avoided. The correct form is "no longer proceed with", which indicates that a previously planned action will be discontinued. As Ludwig AI points out, omitting the word "no" leads to a grammatically unsound construction. It's also important to look for alternatives phrases like "cease to proceed with", "discontinue proceeding with" or "stop proceeding with". Despite its rare occurrence, the intended meaning often surfaces in neutral contexts such as news and media, where clear communication is crucial. Remember to always prioritize grammatical accuracy and clarity in your writing.

More alternative expressions

Phrases that express similar concepts, ordered by semantic similarity:

No longer proceed with

Adds the necessary negative adverb "no" to correct the grammatical structure and express cessation.

Stop proceeding with

A simple substitution of "longer" to "stop" to correct the grammatical structure.

Cease to proceed with

Replaces "longer" with "cease to" for a more formal way to indicate stopping an action.

Discontinue proceeding with

Uses "discontinue" to convey the meaning of stopping, with a slight shift in emphasis.

Not continue with

Uses the negative "not continue" to express the cessation of an action.

Halt the proceeding with

Replaces the verb "proceed" with a noun "proceeding" and the verb "halt", altering the sentence structure.

Refrain from proceeding with

Indicates a conscious decision to abstain from continuing with something.

Abort the proceeding with

Implies a more abrupt or forceful cessation of an action.

Postpone proceeding with

Indicates a temporary suspension rather than a complete stop.

Defer proceeding with

Similar to postpone, but suggests a more indefinite delay.

FAQs

What is the correct way to say "longer proceed with"?

The correct way to phrase this is "no longer proceed with". The addition of "no" makes the sentence grammatically sound and conveys the intended meaning of ceasing an action.

What does "no longer proceed with" mean?

It means that an action or plan that was previously underway will now be stopped or discontinued. For example, "Due to budget cuts, we will "no longer proceed with" the expansion project".

Are there any alternatives to "no longer proceed with"?

Yes, you can use phrases such as "cease to continue with", "discontinue", or "halt the proceedings" depending on the context. Each alternative offers a slightly different nuance in meaning.

Is "longer proceed with" ever correct?

No, the phrase "longer proceed with" is generally considered grammatically incorrect in standard English. You should always include "no" before "longer" to make the sentence grammatically correct. Use the phrase "no longer proceed with" instead.