longer going

USAGE SUMMARY

The phrase "longer going" is not correct in standard written English.
It may be intended to convey a sense of duration or continuation, but it lacks clarity and proper grammatical structure. Example: "I am no longer going to tolerate this behavior."

⚠ May contain grammatical issues

News & Media

Academia

Formal & Business

Science

Human-verified examples from authoritative sources

Exact Expressions

60 human-written examples

So access is no longer going to be a problem.

Cornell University

"That's no longer going to work," Mattis argued.

The New Yorker

"Suddenly there was a possibility of no longer going blind.

The Guardian

"We pulled back and that's no longer going to happen".

The New York Times - Sports

Thus, Japanese programs are no longer going to be overwhelmingly dominated by business majors.

Massachusetts Institute of Technology

It is no longer going to be held at Radio Perfecto.

Columbia University

But he is happy that his data is no longer going to Denver.

The New York Times - Tech

But by evening it appeared that the protesters were no longer going into the embassy compound.

The New York Times

"We made the conscious decision that we were no longer going to be victims," she said.

The New York Times

"We're no longer going to have that foot in the door".

The New York Times

In the next breath he said, "We are no longer going to coöperate with you.

The New Yorker

Expert writing Tips

Best practice

When aiming to express that something is ceasing, use the phrase "no longer" followed by the appropriate verb. For instance, instead of saying "it's longer going to happen", opt for "it's no longer going to happen".

Common error

Avoid using "longer going" to indicate that something will cease in the future. This construction is grammatically incorrect. Instead, use "no longer going" or "not going to" to convey the intended meaning.

Linguistic Context

The phrase "longer going" functions incorrectly as a verb phrase, typically intended to express future action cessation. As Ludwig AI points out, this phrase doesn't follow standard English grammar rules and requires correction for proper usage. It often appears where "no longer going" is intended.

Expression frequency: Very common

Frequent in

News & Media

46%

Academia

12%

Formal & Business

5%

Less common in

Science

37%

Reference

0%

Wiki

0%

Ludwig's WRAP-UP

In summary, while the phrase "longer going" appears frequently in diverse sources, Ludwig AI marks it as grammatically incorrect. The intended meaning of future cessation should be expressed using "no longer" or "not going to". Given its prevalence, it's crucial to recognize and correct this phrase to ensure clarity and grammatical accuracy in writing. Ludwig's analysis emphasizes the importance of proper usage despite the phrase's common occurrence.

More alternative expressions

Phrases that express similar concepts, ordered by semantic similarity:

no longer

Adds "no" to create a negation, altering the meaning to indicate something has ceased.

not going to

Expands the phrase to specify a future action that will not occur.

not continuing

Uses a different verb to express that something will not continue.

ceasing to go

Employs a more formal verb to indicate the end of movement or activity.

stopping to go

Indicates an interruption in the act of going.

going longer

Reverses the word order, which changes the meaning and grammatical function of the phrase.

discontinuing to go

Suggests a more formal and definitive end to the act of going.

not proceeding

Uses 'proceeding' to replace 'going', changing the nuance to a formal context.

not advancing

Employs 'advancing' instead of 'going' to imply a lack of progress.

not moving

Replaces 'going' with 'moving', indicating a lack of physical movement.

FAQs

What is the correct way to use "longer going" in a sentence?

The phrase "longer going" is grammatically incorrect. The correct phrasing to indicate that something will cease is "no longer".

What can I say instead of "longer going" to indicate something will stop?

To express that something will stop, use phrases like "no longer going to" or "not going to".

Is "longer going" ever grammatically correct?

"Longer going" is rarely grammatically correct. It's typically used incorrectly. The correct form usually involves "no longer" to indicate cessation.

How does the meaning change if I use "no longer going" instead of "longer going"?

Using "no longer going to" completely reverses the meaning. "Longer going" is grammatically incorrect, while "no longer going" correctly indicates that something will not continue.