Used and loved by millions
Since I tried Ludwig back in 2017, I have been constantly using it in both editing and translation. Ever since, I suggest it to my translators at ProSciEditing.

Justyna Jupowicz-Kozak
CEO of Professional Science Editing for Scientists @ prosciediting.com
long time longer
Grammar usage guide and real-world examplesUSAGE SUMMARY
The phrase "long time longer" is not correct and does not make sense in written English.
It seems to be an attempt to express an extended duration, but it is unclear and redundant. Example: "I thought it would take a long time longer than expected to finish the project."
⚠ May contain grammatical issues
News & Media
Science
Wiki
Table of contents
Usage summary
Human-verified examples
Expert writing tips
Linguistic context
Ludwig's wrap-up
Alternative expressions
FAQs
Human-verified examples from authoritative sources
Exact Expressions
15 human-written examples
"They've been in our family a long time, longer than we've lived in Tampa, even.
News & Media
It has been with us a long time — longer than the Bush Administration (and nothing seems more interminable than that).
News & Media
The pause lasted a long time — longer, it seemed, than most Lyft rides take to arrive — before he finally answered.
News & Media
But as the Daily News ad suggests, Trump has been thinking about politics for a long time — longer, it may turn out, than is good for America.
News & Media
"The truth is that she was a huge part of my life for a long time, longer than people realize," Mr. Carl said after much prodding.
News & Media
It will take a long time, longer even than a winter's camping on St Paul's cobbles, but this is as good a place to start as any".
News & Media
Human-verified similar examples from authoritative sources
Similar Expressions
45 human-written examples
On the other hand, as the chromium carbide precipitation occurs for samples treated at relatively high temperatures (higher than 450 °C for 12 h), and long times (longer than 36 h at 400 °C), C atoms would leave the supersaturated (expanded) martensite phase solid solution, leading the plate martensite to transform back to lath martensite.
Although this may seem like a long time, the longer and better you rinse, the longer and better your hair can be!
Wiki
The answer was a very long time indeed, longer than man or scripture could measure.
News & Media
Applying them took a very long time, much longer than a regular manicure, and so was even more boring to sit through.
News & Media
I've known for a long time, probably longer than you, so you don't need to tell me!' Every day is amazing".
News & Media
Expert writing Tips
Best practice
Replace the phrase "long time longer" with simpler and grammatically correct alternatives such as "much longer" or "a longer time" for clarity and better communication.
Common error
Avoid using "long time longer" because it's redundant; "longer" already implies an extended period. Choose concise alternatives like "much longer" to prevent awkward phrasing.
Source & Trust
84%
Authority and reliability
2.8/5
Expert rating
Real-world application tested
Linguistic Context
The phrase "long time longer" functions as a comparative expression, aiming to indicate that something takes more time than something else. However, as Ludwig indicates, the construction is grammatically incorrect and redundant.
Frequent in
News & Media
34%
Science
33%
Wiki
16%
Less common in
Formal & Business
0%
Reference
0%
Encyclopedias
0%
Ludwig's WRAP-UP
In summary, while the phrase "long time longer" appears in various contexts, it's generally considered grammatically incorrect and redundant. As Ludwig AI explains, simpler alternatives like "much longer" or "a longer time" are clearer and more appropriate. Despite its presence in some media, its incorrectness makes it unsuitable for formal contexts. When aiming to compare durations, opting for grammatically sound phrases ensures clarity and credibility.
More alternative expressions(6)
Phrases that express similar concepts, ordered by semantic similarity:
much longer
Direct replacement emphasizing a greater duration, more grammatically sound.
a considerably longer period
More formal, highlighting the extended duration with stronger emphasis.
significantly more time
Replaces 'long time' with 'more time' emphasizing significance.
an even greater duration
Emphasizes that the duration is greater than some previous duration under discussion.
a far more extended timeframe
More formal substitution indicating a notably prolonged duration.
a substantially longer interval
Emphasizes the comparative aspect with a more formal tone.
appreciably more time
Suggests a noticeable difference in duration.
a prolonged duration
Emphasizes the length of the duration and is grammatically correct.
an extensive period
Offers a simple alternative that avoids the grammatical error.
a protracted length of time
Highlights that the time is stretched or drawn out.
FAQs
Is "long time longer" grammatically correct?
No, the phrase "long time longer" is grammatically incorrect and considered redundant. It's better to use alternatives like "much longer" or "a longer time".
What does "long time longer" mean?
The phrase attempts to express a duration that is extended compared to another duration, but it's unclear and stylistically poor. "Much longer" is a clearer way to convey this meaning.
When is it appropriate to use "long time longer"?
It's generally not appropriate to use "long time longer" in formal writing or speech. Simpler and more grammatically sound alternatives like "much longer" or "a longer period" are preferred.
What are some alternatives to "long time longer"?
Instead of "long time longer", use "much longer", "significantly more time", or "a considerably longer period" to express an extended duration more effectively.
Editing plus AI, all in one place.
Stop switching between tools. Your AI writing partner for everything—polishing proposals, crafting emails, finding the right tone.
Table of contents
Usage summary
Human-verified examples
Expert writing tips
Linguistic context
Ludwig's wrap-up
Alternative expressions
FAQs
Source & Trust
84%
Authority and reliability
2.8/5
Expert rating
Real-world application tested