long term effects

USAGE SUMMARY

"long term effects" is a correct and usable phrase in written English.
It is often used in scientific papers and other writings that discuss the results of a study or experiment. For example, "The study found that exposure to this chemical had long term effects on fertility in animals."

✓ Grammatically correct

News & Media

Academia

Science

Human-verified examples from authoritative sources

Exact Expressions

5 human-written examples

Long Term Effects of In Utero Exposure on Children: 20.

Princeton University

But what about long term effects?

BBC

Can You Reverse the Long Term Effects of Drugs?

Vice

But the long term effects were far more destructive.

Huffington Post

These long term effects require proper evaluation.

Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations

Human-verified similar examples from authoritative sources

Similar Expressions

55 human-written examples

More significant were the long-term effects.

The New York Times - Sports

The long-term effects are scary.

The New York Times

The long-term effects were catastrophic.

The Guardian - Business

The long-term effects will be great.

The Guardian

But were there also long-term effects?

The Guardian

What can the long-term effects be?

The Guardian - Sport

Expert writing Tips

Best practice

When discussing "long term effects", be specific about the timeframe considered 'long term'. This provides clarity and avoids ambiguity.

Common error

Avoid attributing "long term effects" solely to one cause without acknowledging other contributing factors. Acknowledge potential confounding variables for accuracy.

Linguistic Context

The phrase "long term effects" functions primarily as a noun phrase, often serving as the subject or object of a sentence. As confirmed by Ludwig AI, it's a correct and usable phrase. Examples in Ludwig demonstrate its use in discussing lasting impacts across various domains.

Expression frequency: Very common

Frequent in

News & Media

38%

Academia

30%

Science

20%

Less common in

Formal & Business

6%

Encyclopedias

3%

Social Media

3%

Ludwig's WRAP-UP

In summary, "long term effects" is a grammatically sound and frequently used phrase, as confirmed by Ludwig AI. It serves to highlight enduring consequences across diverse fields such as news, academia, and science. The phrase's versatility allows it to describe impacts that can be positive, negative, or neutral, emphasizing the importance of considering extended timeframes when evaluating actions or policies. While generally neutral, its use often leans towards formality, particularly in academic and scientific discourse. When using this phrase, clearly define the timeframe to ensure clarity and avoid overstating causal relationships.

More alternative expressions

Phrases that express similar concepts, ordered by semantic similarity:

lasting consequences

Focuses on the enduring nature of the results or outcomes.

enduring impacts

Emphasizes the significant and sustained influence or effect.

sustained effects

Underscores the continuation and maintenance of the effects over time.

chronic repercussions

Highlights the ongoing and often negative results or consequences.

future implications

Focuses on the consequences that will unfold in the time ahead.

prolonged outcomes

Focuses on the extended duration of the results.

residual impacts

Highlights the remaining or lingering consequences after a period.

long range impacts

Stresses the widespread and extended reach of the consequences.

permanent sequelae

Highlights irreversible consequences, typically in a medical context.

down the line consequences

Focuses on consequences that appear after an amount of time has passed.

FAQs

How can I use "long term effects" in a sentence?

You can use "long term effects" to describe lasting consequences or impacts resulting from a particular action, event, or exposure. For example, "The "long term effects" of climate change are a major concern".

What are some alternatives to "long term effects"?

Alternatives include "lasting consequences", "enduring impacts", or "prolonged outcomes", depending on the specific context.

Are "long term effects" always negative?

No, "long term effects" can be positive, negative, or neutral. It simply refers to the consequences that persist over an extended period.

What is the difference between "short term effects" and "long term effects"?

"Short term effects" refer to immediate or near-term consequences, while "long term effects" describe the consequences that manifest or persist over a more extended duration. It's important to consider both when evaluating an action or policy.