Your English writing platform
Discover LudwigSuggestions(1)
Exact(10)
However, in the long term (12 months), the hearing levels were equal again.
The results of this study showed that long term (12 months) RT can improve lung function and activity tolerance, and decrease frequency of acute exacerbation for COPD patients.
Overall, there was no evidence that intervention changes pain in the shorter (6 months) or long term (12 months or 2 years).
There was no evidence that intervention changes pain in the short (6 months) or long term (12 months and 2 years).
We split outcomes into short term (three months' follow-up or less), medium (three to less than 12 months), and long term (12 months or more).
In the long term (12 months), there were no significant differences between the intervention and the comparison groups in physical functioning, diet quality index, fatigue, and energy expenditure as measured by telephone questionnaires (Demark-Wahnefried et al, 2006).
Similar(50)
Short term (28 days) and long term (9 months) repeated injections with a standard dose of 60 Units/kg and a high dose of 300 Units/kg were administered to monkeys (n = 4/sex/dose).
Randomised trials of interventions to maintain weight loss provided to initially obese adults (aged ≥18) after weight loss of ≥5% body weight with long term (≥12 months) follow-up of weight change (main outcome) were included.
26 We grouped the outcomes into four time points of assessment: immediate term (≤2 weeks), short term (>2 weeks but ≤3 months), intermediate term (>3 months but ≤12 months), and long term (>12 months).
CC was associated with significant reduction in MACE during the short to medium term (RR=0.54; 95% CI 0.31 to 0.95, p=0.03) that was not sustained in the long term (>12 months follow-up) where only the COPES trial 39 reported MACE (RR 1.04; 95% CI 0.51 to 2.14, p=0.91) (figure 2).
Effectiveness was judged for short term (≤3 months from randomisation), medium term (>3 and <12 months) and <span class="lh">long term (≥12 months), as recommended by the 2009 Updated Method Guidelines for Systematic Reviews in the Cochrane Back Review Group and in keeping with the original 2008 systematic review [ 13, 46].
Write better and faster with AI suggestions while staying true to your unique style.
Since I tried Ludwig back in 2017, I have been constantly using it in both editing and translation. Ever since, I suggest it to my translators at ProSciEditing.

Justyna Jupowicz-Kozak
CEO of Professional Science Editing for Scientists @ prosciediting.com