"logical rationality" is a correct and usable phrase in written English.
You can use it for any situation in which someone is using logical reasoning to make a decision. For example, "The board relied on logical rationality when deciding on their next course of action."
It is enough to note that there is no logical reason why judgments of reasonableness or irrationality in relation to emotions need be regarded as any more subjective than any other judgments of rationality in human affairs.
By the late 19th century, Tagore was already fascinated by the aleatory, associative workings of poetry, and he articulates this in 1895 in his essay on Bengali nursery rhymes; these chharas, or rhymes, he says, subvert logical expectations and rationality to make space for the random.
This "core desire" finds its expression, for example, in the ways analytic feminists use some of what we might call the "core concepts" that Cudd mentions above: truth, logical consistency, objectivity, rationality and justice.
No, all that follows is that logicality (proof by logical argument) is not the same as rationality.
It is no secret, especially here in America, that we live in a post-Enlightenment age in which rationality, science, evidence, logical argument and debate have lost the battle in many sectors, and perhaps even in society generally, to superstition, faith, opinion and orthodoxy.
Based on the concept of minimal simultaneous concessions, we propose a solution to n-person bargaining problems and prove that the solution is uniquely characterized by five logical axioms: Consistency, Comprehensiveness, Collective rationality, Disagreement, and Contraction independence.
Rationality turns on consistency, and the logical is derivative from the rational.
Of course it is incoherence as a logical defect, rather than one of means/ends rationality that is Christensen's focus, but since sanctioning bets as fair that cannot be fair is not a property of incoherent degrees of belief alone, he has not shown incoherence to be on a par with inconsistency with full belief, where the defect lies with the beliefs themselves.
