Sentence examples for logical forms of from inspiring English sources

The general idea at the root of Russell's theory of descriptions that the grammatical structures of ordinary language are distinct from, and often conceal, the true "logical forms" of expressions has become his most enduring contribution to philosophy.

According to one tradition in analytic philosophy (sometimes referred to as formalism), for example, the definition of a concept can be determined by uncovering the underlying logical structures, or "logical forms," of the sentences used to express it.

The logical forms of judgment are in essence the forms of combination of concepts in judgments.

So the superficial features of sentences are not infallible guides to the logical forms of propositions.

This invited the thought that other philosophical puzzles might dissolve if we properly understood the logical forms of our claims.

So Frege, Russell, and Wittgenstein all held in varying ways that psychological reports are also misleading with respect to the logical forms of the indicated propositions.

Some Bayesian logicists (e.g., Carnap) thought that inductive logic might be made to depend solely on the logical form of sentences, just like deductive logic.

It was Russell's belief that by using the new logic of his day, philosophers would be able to exhibit the underlying "logical form" of natural-language statements.

The result is a formula exhibiting the logical form of the sentence.

Wittgenstein denied the predicament, asserting that in his treatise the logical form of language is "shown" but not "said".

The surrealist essayists of the 20th century poured their scorn on detective fiction as the most fiercely logical form of writing.