logical errors

USAGE SUMMARY

The phrase "logical errors" is correct and usable in written English.
It can be used when discussing mistakes in reasoning or flaws in an argument or analysis. Example: "The report was dismissed due to several logical errors that undermined its conclusions."

✓ Grammatically correct

Science

News & Media

Formal & Business

Human-verified examples from authoritative sources

Exact Expressions

60 human-written examples

Despite the logical errors in Mitt Romney's "47 percent" comments, we do face bankruptcy when the baby boomers retire and a shrinking percentage of workers must pay the ever growing expenses of a ballooning class of retirees.

The New York Times

That Heritage Foundation broadside accuses the Congressional Budget Office of making elementary logical errors, but if you actually read the office's report, it's clear that the foundation is willfully misreading it.

The New York Times - Magazine

"I specialise in finding logical errors," he said.

BBC

In another, he designed a program that could identify logical errors in OBO Foundry ontologies.

Science Magazine

In Q-CRQ decoding, we should handle two types of ambiguity: the physical and logical errors.

EURASIP Journal on Wireless Communications and Networking

The developed tool assesses some of the issues with the code such as evaluating the performance and logical errors.

Human-centric Computing and Information Sciences

Ontology editors have reasoning tools to discover such logical errors like discovering redundant links or cycle check routines.

Journal of Cheminformatics

For in brief, self-verifying judgments do not enable Oscar to avoid simple logical errors in his reasoning, in the manner we would expect of someone rational.

SEP

Automatic model checking is used to determine the error-free design of the SIS Safety Instrumented Systemm) and to find the logical errors in the chemical processes.

Journal of Loss Prevention in the Process Industries

In addition to syntax and type errors, logical errors can be easily introduced since text editors cannot guarantee that changes are performed consistently over the whole program.

Science of Computer Programming

This method can be applied to verify its correctness of SIS and to find the logical errors by synthesizing a feasible sequence automatically.

Journal of Loss Prevention in the Process Industries

Expert writing Tips

Best practice

When discussing "logical errors", be specific about the type of error to enhance clarity. For example, specify whether it's a fallacy of relevance, ambiguity, or presumption.

Common error

Avoid attributing every mistake to "logical errors". Sometimes, errors arise from factual inaccuracies or simple oversights, not necessarily flawed reasoning.

Linguistic Context

The phrase "logical errors" functions primarily as a noun phrase. It identifies and categorizes mistakes in reasoning or flaws in an argument. The usage is broad, as evidenced by Ludwig's examples across various domains.

Expression frequency: Very common

Frequent in

Science

47%

News & Media

23%

Formal & Business

30%

Less common in

Encyclopedias

0%

Wiki

0%

Social Media

0%

Ludwig's WRAP-UP

In summary, "logical errors" is a commonly used noun phrase for identifying flaws in reasoning across various domains. Ludwig AI confirms its grammatical correctness and wide applicability. To use the phrase effectively, specify the type of logical error to enhance clarity. Be mindful of potential overgeneralizations, and remember that errors may arise from factual inaccuracies as well. Alternative phrases include "reasoning errors" or "fallacies in logic", offering nuanced ways to express similar ideas. When in doubt, remember that identifying and correcting "logical errors" strengthens your arguments and promotes clear, critical thinking.

More alternative expressions

Phrases that express similar concepts, ordered by semantic similarity:

reasoning errors

Focuses specifically on mistakes in the process of reasoning, rather than the errors themselves.

fallacies in logic

Implies a deceptive or misleading element in the logical error.

flaws in reasoning

Highlights the imperfections or weaknesses in the line of reasoning.

inconsistencies in logic

Emphasizes the presence of conflicting or contradictory elements in the logic.

invalid arguments

Focuses on the argument itself being structurally unsound or incorrect.

unsound reasoning

Stresses the weakness or unreliability of the reasoning process.

faulty logic

Suggests a defect or malfunction in the logic being used.

erroneous reasoning

Highlights the incorrectness or inaccuracy of the reasoning.

cognitive biases

Addresses systematic patterns of deviation from norm or rationality in judgment.

thinking errors

A broader term encompassing mistakes in thought processes, not limited to logic.

FAQs

How can I identify "logical errors" in an argument?

Look for inconsistencies, unsupported claims, or deviations from established principles of reasoning. Familiarize yourself with common fallacies like "ad hominem" or "straw man" arguments.

What's the difference between "logical errors" and factual errors?

"Logical errors" involve flaws in reasoning, whereas factual errors involve inaccuracies about verifiable information. You might have all the correct facts but still reach a wrong conclusion because of a logical error.

How do I correct "logical errors" in my own writing?

Carefully review your arguments, ensuring each claim is supported by evidence and that your reasoning follows a clear, consistent path. Seek feedback from others to identify potential blind spots.

Are there specific fields where recognizing "logical errors" is particularly important?

Yes, fields like law, philosophy, science, and journalism heavily rely on sound reasoning. Recognizing "logical errors" is essential for critical thinking and effective communication in these domains.