"logical attitude" is a correct and usable phrase in written English.
It refers to a person's way of thinking or approaching a situation in a logical and rational manner. It is often used to describe someone who has a rational and objective viewpoint. Example: "One of the key qualities of a successful scientist is a logical attitude towards problem-solving." This means that a scientist should approach problems with a logical and analytical mindset in order to find effective solutions.
One standard cognitivist way of explaining the logical relations between attitudes is to offer an account of the contents of the states that are also good candidates for being the contents of the sentences that express those attitudes, for example by postulating propositions as the semantic values of sentences and the contents of beliefs.
Non-cognitivists have developed various ingenious strategies for constructing a theory that preserves the intuitive logical relations between normative attitudes, non-normative attitudes and various mixed attitudes, along with the sentences that express them.
It seemed logical that this same attitude would apply to the torture regime created under George Bush, Dick Cheney and Donald Rumsfeld.
"There is something else that is interesting about children, and that is their attitude toward logical paradoxes.
The prevalent attitude of logical empiricism, following the celebrated discussion of "necessary connections" in nature by the Scottish philosopher David Hume (1711 76), was to be wary of invoking notions of necessity.
For it is a commitment of the A-type approach that we work with one attitude whose logical relations are inherited from that of the contents.
It is important for understanding Leśniewski's development and his attitude to logical systems as endowed with meaning from the start, and not meaningless formal games, to know that he developed in his systems chronologically in the reverse order from their order of logical priority.
A relevant issue seems to be whether the logical relations among the attitudes expressed must be the same as the logical relationships that hold among the sentences used to express them.
First, he explicitly isolates and discusses propositional attitudes in the context of his epistemology of judgment and his ethics of belief, so it is obvious that he does not confuse logical modality with propositional attitudes.
Also, it is mainly due to AI that the problem of limited rationality has become a topic of serious interest, providing a counterbalance to the idealizations of philosophy and economics.[37] So you would think that a logical model of propositional attitudes that is committed to closure under logical consequence would be highly unpopular in AI.
