In some cases, a working system is inspired by ideas from logic, but acquires features that at first seem logically problematic but can later be explained by developing new ideas in logical theory.
But the extension of the idea to quantificational logic is problematic, despite Wittgenstein's efforts to reduce quantificational logic to truth-functional logic; as we now know, there is no algorithm for deciding if a quantificational sentence is valid.
While many accept the standard view that idealist logic was problematic and no rival for the later logic of Russell and Wittgenstein, it bears noting that, given Bosanquet's view of the centrality of logic to philosophy, he engaged and debated then-current developments in logic, such as that of Franz Brentano, Alexius Meinong, and Russell.
Given that the UK is prepared to allow a significant foreign involvement in the development and operation of the UK's nuclear deterrent, such involvement in the civil nuclear programme should, by this logic, not be problematic.
But the two provisions appear to be stuck in a loop of circular logic that seems problematic to me.
Indeed, a key argument against statistical tests and p-values as measures of evidence has been their problematic logic.
While logical contradictions involve mathematical or logical terms, like class, number, and hence show that our logic or mathematics is problematic, semantical contradictions involve, besides purely logical terms, notions like "thought", "language", "symbolism", which, according to Ramsey, are empirical (not formal) terms.
This kind of pickup artist logic perfectly encapsulates the problematic outlook on women that these guys have.
This kind of pick-up artist "logic" perfectly encapsulates the problematic outlook on women that these guys have.
But the logic behind the proposals is problematic in at least three, really big ways.
