Sentence examples for logic of discovery from inspiring English sources

With respect to the second way of conceptualizing knowledge generation, many philosophers argue in a similar fashion that because the process of discovery involves an irrational, intuitive process, which cannot be examined logically, a logic of discovery cannot be construed.

As his work shows, the sciences do not develop exclusively as a result of a progressive and inexorable logic of discovery.

In the broad sense, "logic" of discovery refers to the schematic representation of reasoning procedures.

The special logic of discovery is the logic of abductive or "retroductive" inferences (Hanson 1958).

On this conception, then, there could be a logic of discovery as well as a logic of proof.

These examples from chemistry put pressure on Reichenbach's claim that there cannot be a logic of discovery.

But chemistry provides a more interesting challenge to Reichenbach: It apparently gives us logics of discovery.

Early 20th-century logics of discovery can best be described as theories of the mental operations involved in knowledge generation.

The last section shows that there were a few attempts to develop logics of discovery in the 1920s and 1930s.

This line of argument has much in common with the logics of discovery described in section 4 above but it is now explicitly pitched against the disciplinary distinction tied to the context distinction.

Although the idea that there cannot be a logic of scientific discovery often assumed the status of orthodoxy, it was not unquestioned.