Sentence examples for logic logic from inspiring English sources

It is in this sense that the word logic is to be taken in such designations as "epistemic logic" (logic of knowledge), "doxastic logic" (logic of belief), "deontic logic" (logic of norms), "the logic of science," "inductive logic," and so on.

For treatment of particular branches of philosophical inquiry, see aesthetics; biology, philosophy of; education, philosophy of; epistemology; ethics; history, philosophy of; ideology; law, philosophy of; logic; logic, philosophy of; mathematics, philosophy of; metaphysics; mind, philosophy of; philosophical anthropology; physics, philosophy of; religion, philosophy of; science, philosophy of.

The presupposition of ACC is always ⊤. Epistemic logic, the logic of knowledge, is a branch of modal logic where the modality 'i knows that' is studied (compare the entries: epistemic logic, logic of belief revision).

As Mill declares as the beginning of his System of Logic, logic has two parts: the 'science of reasoning, as well as an art, founded on that science' (1843, 4).

We present an abstract framework for default reasoning, which includes Theorist, default logic, logic programming, autoepistemic logic, non-monotonic modal logics, and certain instances of circumscription as special cases.

I respect and love this show so deeply, and reading its figurehead espouse such backwards logic — logic the show itself contradicts — is maddening.

Our study also indicates that it is typically difficult for pure logic-logic 3D integration to achieve a simultaneous (10%, 10 %, 10) improvement in (performance, power, area/cost) compared to the conventional 2D implementation.

There are several proposals in the literature devoted to combining logics presented in different ways by means of algebraic fibring: propositional Hilbert calculi, first-order modal logics, higher-order modal logics, non-truth-functional logics, logics semantically presented through ordered algebras (encompassing generalized Kripke models) etc.

On the logical level, we investigate groundedness in the context of logic programming, autoepistemic logic, default logic and argumentation frameworks.

Our rationale for doing as much is that one will get the technical details, and the particular philosophical issues that motivated them, from looking at specific logics—specific theories of logical consequence (e.g., relevant logics, substructural logics, non-monotonic logics, dynamic logics, modal logics, theories of quantification, and so on).

See formal logic: modal logic.