An example of large discrepancy in location, in fact one of the most extreme and curious cases, is shown in Fig. 10.
Two (5, 6) of the 3 studies reporting positive associations between fish intake and T2D risk were examined in the United States; thus, it may be reasonable to speculate that other characteristics of these cohorts and/or the composition of fish sources as determined by geographic location, could explain the discrepancy between the US findings and those reported in this study and others (1– 3, 8).
When the participant was fixating the target the experimenter initiated the trial, and any discrepancy between gaze location and the target location was corrected.
To explore the rationale underpinning this disagreement we evaluated data separately for cases with location, size, and morphology discrepancies.
The following covariates were included in the multivariate regression analysis: age, gender, income, specialty attainment, location, list size, working hours, discrepancy between preferred and actual list size, discrepancy between preferred and actual working hours.
We find that the back-projection locations are quite similar to the catalog locations and show no systematic bias, with differences in location being comparable to discrepancies between the USGS and JMA locations.
The differences are scattered over the globe and not confined to any particular geographical location, though the largest discrepancies occur in the polar regions and in the mid-Atlantic.
Users with bad radio conditions experience lower data rates than users with better radio conditions, leading to a spatial unfairness, which we define as the discrepancy between location-dependent user arrival probabilities and the observed residence probabilities in steady state.
ESTs showing discrepancies for location among three homoeologous chromosomes were not considered for analysis.
Nevertheless, without quality assurance, the Multan data might simply have been pooled with those from the other locations, and the discrepancies, though still misleadingly influential upon the survey as a whole, would not then have been obvious.
