By applying the Rproximity factor to determine the localization ordering of the unknown nodes, they will be located in the following order: {9, 3, 7, 12, 13, 15, 11, 8, 14, 1, 4, 5, 2, 6, 10}.
Moreover, the RSM was also used in order to identify whether successive response categories for each item are located in the expected order.
This indicated that in these two isolates, EhGI1 through EhGM5 were present and located in the same order and orientation as in the EHOS.
On average, they show 98.5% sequence identity, and are located in the same order.
Also the RSM showed that successive response categories for all items were not located in the expected order.
Thus, it is not clear where NADPH oxidase is located in the hierarchical order of TLR4 signaling pathways.
The genes of SLA, MAT, COX13, and APN were located in the identical order and orientation in both MAT1-1 and MAT1-2 idiomorphs.
The PCM also revealed that, successive response categories for all items were located in the expected order except for category 1 in self- and proxy-reports.
The main objective of the current study, hence, was to determine whether the adjacent response categories for each item in the Persian version of the KIDSCREEN-27 were located in the expected order.
This might be explained by the fact that the reverse primer of the ERBV 5'-UTR cRT-PCR assay was located in the higher order internal ribosome entry site [ 7].
